People said this was going to be a competitive game. People said the edge in the playoff picture was at stake. People said both these top teams would put on a show. Boy oh boy, were we all right. This was probably the most exciting game I've seen this season. A simple start turned into a fight to comeback, and then ended in overtime to the team that truly earned the victory.
The beginning of the game had me a little worried. The offense on both teams were looking great. The Giants got on the board first with a field goal, and the Panthers answered back with a touchdown. It was back-and-forth a little, but Carolina had the edge a little, and by the half the Giants were down 21-13. It was still close enough that there was some hope.
The Giants scored a touchdown, but again the Panthers answered back with another. Even with another touchdown, we would need a 2-point conversion to tie up the game. The Giants played hard, and had their running game stepped up by now that they could pull it off. Brandon Jacobs, who I've nicknamed "The Beast" this season, ran through Carolina's defense to get the touchdown. Then they beat the odds, and Manning threw to Hixon to get the 2 points, and tie it up 28-28. Our defense got their act together enough to hold the Panthers, who luckily missed a 50 yard field goal, until the 4th quarter ended.
Now it was intense. One team just needed to score, and nobody wanted to see another tie game like one earlier this year. The Giants had possession first, but couldn't make their way close enough to the endzone. The Panthers had decent field position, but they couldn't move forward, and had to give the ball back. This time, our star Ward took over with three great runs that brought us to 2 yards from a touchdown or an easy field goal. But as was expected, we used Jacobs to bulldoze through to get the touchdown. For me, it was an exciting end to a great game. And now I'm comfortable with where the Giants are. We're top of our division, we got a first round bye, our games will be at home, and we're officially No. 1 seed in the NFC. Looking good team, looking good.
Moving on, since I'll be going to California this weekend, I know that the plane ride will give me some time to actually read a good book. Now, I read a lot of different books, fiction and non-fiction, action, drama, sci-fi........basically anything male-oriented (at least I would hope). Because of this, I usually read books from various authors, but I do have one in particular that has some great books. I'm talking about Tom Clancy.
I first started reading his books in high school. His stories revolve around governments and militaries, which lead to some intricate stories. What makes his fictional work great is how he takes several different stories and ties them together in a way that makes absolute sense. You read his books, and atfirst things are going in different directions. But after some time, it piles on top of eachother to the point that you get even more into it because you know where the characters have come from, and what has led up to the events in front of you. Basically, your time reading the story has been worth it.
Since I'm partial to action, Clancy manages to fit that in to his stories. Because he has a military background, he has a knack for descirbing any kind of battle, from the ground, sea, or air; between soldiers and their technology. He keeps it that it's easy to understand. He doesn't hold back either in the descriptions. We know war is violent and gruesome, so he tells it as such. And that makes it even more believable.
If I had to pick a novel of his as my absolute favorite, I'd have to pick "Rainbow Six." There's a few reasons why I have to pick this one. This one is a little easier to understand than many of his others, mainly because of its set-up. It also features one of my favorite characters, spy-turned-leader John Clark. Finally, this book easily has the most action of any other, and is described so well that it's easy to picture. I will list his other books I've read so far: The Hunt For Red October, Patriot Games, The Cardinal of the Kremlin, Clear and Present Danger, The Sum of All Fears, Without Remorse, SSN, The Bear and The Dragon, and Red Rabbit.
Just to throw this out there, I have seen every movie based on Tom Clancy's novels. So far, the ones they've done are Patriot Games, Clear and Present Danger, The Hunt For Red October, and The Sum of All Fears. "Red October" is easily the best as it stuck really close to the novel, both in story and character personalities.
OK, I think I've extended this long enough. Gotta love entertainment in all its forms. So what if I get into it a little.........I know someone out there is enjoying this. Coming up, since TV will be slow this week I'll be talking about tonight's season finale of Prison Break, the Wii side of the Great Debate, and maybe some other fun stuff. That will be later; but right now, you need to find entertainment. Because right now, I'm off in search for the same thing.
Monday, December 22, 2008
Sunday, December 21, 2008
TV Wrap-Up: 12/14-12/20
Another week of TV is in the books. There were plenty high-profile shows ending for the season or going on hiatus, but mostly re-runs because of the upcoming holidays. Let's see what went down:
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles- This was the season finale before the show returns in February at a new night. Interesting storyline with Sarah Connor, who finally gets some real moments on the show that she hadn't had for a few weeks. Awesome ending with a tribute to the mythology of the series. Decent set-up for the character of Riley, though not as interesting. Most everything took a back seat to Sarah, which was fine with me.
Prison Break- Still going strong. Glad to see a character from season 1 make an appearance. A lot of changes were made before the actual season finale tomorrow night. Quite a few surprises made the episode great, as well as some action and tense moments. Considering they could've ended the season with this episode, now the hype is up for the season finale. Hope it delivers.
Heroes- A decent ending before the start of the new season in February. Highlight had to be with Sylar hunting down everyone at Primatech. Some real creativity was shown, although some cheesey moments were also there. Ando's character was stepped up, which was long overdue. The rest wasn't too memorable, but the peek at what's happening next season shows some promise. We'll have to wait and see though.
Friday Night Smackdown!- Actually got a chance to watch a little wrestling! On the upside, some good storytelling with The Miz and John Morrison against Jesse and Festus, a well-done match between Edge and Matt Hardy, and a good welcome for new WWE champion Jeff Hardy. On the downside, a lackluster debut for Ezekiel Jackson, and again more work needs to be done to improve the female wrestlers on the show. In the end, I didn't mind watching this one.
The Soup- The show will be highlighting the best clips of the year, so not too much was new about it. Some jokes were good, but it's hard seeing the same clips again. Still, usually the second part of this special is entertaining, so I'm not too bothered.
WWE Tribute to the Troops- The yearly special took place, and was cut way short. Instead of a full 2-hour event, it was cut down to 1. Only 2 matches took place, and of course the main event had to be the best one. Some little moments were great, including JBL's entrance and some highlights of the troops meeting the wrestlers. Other than that, nothing too outstanding compared to the previous specials.
Sorry if this was a slow TV week, but at least there was something to watch. Coming up in the next blogs will be a highlight of the NY Giants/Carolina Panthers game tonight, Part 2 of The Great Debate (featuring the Wii system), and a look at next year's returning TV shows. Until then, I'm off to find some entertainment.........as for you out there, you might do well to do the same.
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles- This was the season finale before the show returns in February at a new night. Interesting storyline with Sarah Connor, who finally gets some real moments on the show that she hadn't had for a few weeks. Awesome ending with a tribute to the mythology of the series. Decent set-up for the character of Riley, though not as interesting. Most everything took a back seat to Sarah, which was fine with me.
Prison Break- Still going strong. Glad to see a character from season 1 make an appearance. A lot of changes were made before the actual season finale tomorrow night. Quite a few surprises made the episode great, as well as some action and tense moments. Considering they could've ended the season with this episode, now the hype is up for the season finale. Hope it delivers.
Heroes- A decent ending before the start of the new season in February. Highlight had to be with Sylar hunting down everyone at Primatech. Some real creativity was shown, although some cheesey moments were also there. Ando's character was stepped up, which was long overdue. The rest wasn't too memorable, but the peek at what's happening next season shows some promise. We'll have to wait and see though.
Friday Night Smackdown!- Actually got a chance to watch a little wrestling! On the upside, some good storytelling with The Miz and John Morrison against Jesse and Festus, a well-done match between Edge and Matt Hardy, and a good welcome for new WWE champion Jeff Hardy. On the downside, a lackluster debut for Ezekiel Jackson, and again more work needs to be done to improve the female wrestlers on the show. In the end, I didn't mind watching this one.
The Soup- The show will be highlighting the best clips of the year, so not too much was new about it. Some jokes were good, but it's hard seeing the same clips again. Still, usually the second part of this special is entertaining, so I'm not too bothered.
WWE Tribute to the Troops- The yearly special took place, and was cut way short. Instead of a full 2-hour event, it was cut down to 1. Only 2 matches took place, and of course the main event had to be the best one. Some little moments were great, including JBL's entrance and some highlights of the troops meeting the wrestlers. Other than that, nothing too outstanding compared to the previous specials.
Sorry if this was a slow TV week, but at least there was something to watch. Coming up in the next blogs will be a highlight of the NY Giants/Carolina Panthers game tonight, Part 2 of The Great Debate (featuring the Wii system), and a look at next year's returning TV shows. Until then, I'm off to find some entertainment.........as for you out there, you might do well to do the same.
Friday, December 19, 2008
The Great Debate: Playstation 3 vs. Nintendo Wii vs. X-Box 360 (Part 1)
So many controversal debates go on over some very serious issues nowadays. But I'll be honest: not too many of them effect me personally. And the ones that do don't strike me in a passionate way or too many people I know are on my side, so I have no opposite to civilly debate with (and by civilly, which I hope is a word, I mean stomp all over them with my views that are far better than theirs). However, I find my internal conflicts much more interesting. The most recent one that has come up has been in regards as to what should be the next video game system I get. Those of you who know me are thinking, "Didn't he already decide on this?" Although my initial choice was set some time ago, some more recent develops have forced me to open my mind a little, and see the strengths and weaknesses of all available choices. Those choices consist of: Playstation 3 (the front-runner), the Nintendo Wii (the system for all), and the X-Box 360 (the newest contender). Who knows, maybe in the end of all this I could end up owning all three.........but for now, I can only start with one. So for Part 1, I will be going over the potential of the surprise contender that is the X-Box 360.
Lets start with the system in general. Now, there are two forms of the system available: the Pro and the Arcade. The Pro starts at about $299, while the arcade starts at $199. Seeing as how I'm not intense about the online aspects and the amount of memory space available, I think I'll be looking to get the Arcade version, which is also the cheapest system available between the "Top 3." This was the version I played at a friends recently, and I'll admit I was impressed. The graphics are stellar for the system, even though it wasn't even in HD, so I can only imagine. The system uses wireless controllers, which seems to be a new standard for all the newer systems. It uses memory cards as well as hard drives for storing your games, which makes it easy to bring your saved games to a friends. Besides video games, you can also use it to watch DVDs, play music CDs, and view pictures on your digital camera. Only recently has it been seen there are problems with the system, but most of that is due to mishandling by its users. Overall, the system isn't revolutionary, but still has much to offer.
Now then, lets look at the games the system has. See, while many games appear on multiple systems, some seem to be better when played on the XB360. However, considering it's not an immediate argument for choosing this system, I'm going to look at the games that are exclusively for this system. First, I will make an honorable mention to the ever popular "Halo 3." I had played the first one long ago, and it's basically your standard first-person-shooter that offers some things that draw in an insane amount of players. While I respect the game's popularity, I will say that I'm more interested in another shoot-em up action series I've seen that thoroughly impresses me. Just 3 words: "Gears of War." This is strong game graphically, it's easily playable, and easily addictive especially when you get your friends involved. This game alone first peaked my interest in the system. Other mentionable games:
- Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation (I love this series that originally was on Playstation, but now has jumped ship. Fun to play, and very addictive)
- BioShock and F.E.AR. (I paired these up because they're similar games, and because they're also on Playstation 2. Still, most PC games translate better to the X-Box, and these two are popular and very impressive. Definitely must haves)
- Dead Rising (First watched a friend play this game, and it looked very fun. I have a thing for zombies, but this game made it exciting to take them on)
- Condemned 2: Bloodshot (This game I played at my friends, and was pleased with its unique style. However, it seems I might need to see the original to understand where it came from)
As you can see, there's a lot to say about how much I would like this system, but there are some flaws that would deter me. The biggest factor is that many of my favorite game series aren't available on this system. Tekken, Metal Gear, Final Fantasy.......games I play regularly, and yet they're only playable elsewhere. Although I could explore the series the X-Box 360 has to offer, many are sequels to original X-Box games that I've never played, and I won't get the full experience. And based on my research, only some if not all of the original Xbox games aren't playable on the new system. If there are some, than I'd have no problem buying the cheap Xbox games to try out. But for now, that's fairly uncertain. Lastly, looking into future games coming out, I'm not seeing a lot that gain my attention. If I'm going to play this system for a long time, I want to know there will be some good games coming out that I can play.
Well, I think that's enough for the info. I will conclude by saying that the Xbox 360 is a good choice for me just because of the games available, and the price. It's not my first choice, but I would gladly make use of the system if I owned it. Had enough yet?
So, as for my next posts, you will get Part 2 of this debate, as well as the weekly TV round-up. That's the entertainment you can look forward to........but for now, you're on your own. Find something entertaining right now. What? You think I'm going to sit here until I can put my next blog up? No, I think I'll find some entertainment of my own.
Lets start with the system in general. Now, there are two forms of the system available: the Pro and the Arcade. The Pro starts at about $299, while the arcade starts at $199. Seeing as how I'm not intense about the online aspects and the amount of memory space available, I think I'll be looking to get the Arcade version, which is also the cheapest system available between the "Top 3." This was the version I played at a friends recently, and I'll admit I was impressed. The graphics are stellar for the system, even though it wasn't even in HD, so I can only imagine. The system uses wireless controllers, which seems to be a new standard for all the newer systems. It uses memory cards as well as hard drives for storing your games, which makes it easy to bring your saved games to a friends. Besides video games, you can also use it to watch DVDs, play music CDs, and view pictures on your digital camera. Only recently has it been seen there are problems with the system, but most of that is due to mishandling by its users. Overall, the system isn't revolutionary, but still has much to offer.
Now then, lets look at the games the system has. See, while many games appear on multiple systems, some seem to be better when played on the XB360. However, considering it's not an immediate argument for choosing this system, I'm going to look at the games that are exclusively for this system. First, I will make an honorable mention to the ever popular "Halo 3." I had played the first one long ago, and it's basically your standard first-person-shooter that offers some things that draw in an insane amount of players. While I respect the game's popularity, I will say that I'm more interested in another shoot-em up action series I've seen that thoroughly impresses me. Just 3 words: "Gears of War." This is strong game graphically, it's easily playable, and easily addictive especially when you get your friends involved. This game alone first peaked my interest in the system. Other mentionable games:
- Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation (I love this series that originally was on Playstation, but now has jumped ship. Fun to play, and very addictive)
- BioShock and F.E.AR. (I paired these up because they're similar games, and because they're also on Playstation 2. Still, most PC games translate better to the X-Box, and these two are popular and very impressive. Definitely must haves)
- Dead Rising (First watched a friend play this game, and it looked very fun. I have a thing for zombies, but this game made it exciting to take them on)
- Condemned 2: Bloodshot (This game I played at my friends, and was pleased with its unique style. However, it seems I might need to see the original to understand where it came from)
As you can see, there's a lot to say about how much I would like this system, but there are some flaws that would deter me. The biggest factor is that many of my favorite game series aren't available on this system. Tekken, Metal Gear, Final Fantasy.......games I play regularly, and yet they're only playable elsewhere. Although I could explore the series the X-Box 360 has to offer, many are sequels to original X-Box games that I've never played, and I won't get the full experience. And based on my research, only some if not all of the original Xbox games aren't playable on the new system. If there are some, than I'd have no problem buying the cheap Xbox games to try out. But for now, that's fairly uncertain. Lastly, looking into future games coming out, I'm not seeing a lot that gain my attention. If I'm going to play this system for a long time, I want to know there will be some good games coming out that I can play.
Well, I think that's enough for the info. I will conclude by saying that the Xbox 360 is a good choice for me just because of the games available, and the price. It's not my first choice, but I would gladly make use of the system if I owned it. Had enough yet?
So, as for my next posts, you will get Part 2 of this debate, as well as the weekly TV round-up. That's the entertainment you can look forward to........but for now, you're on your own. Find something entertaining right now. What? You think I'm going to sit here until I can put my next blog up? No, I think I'll find some entertainment of my own.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
A Quick Look At The Ultimate Fighter Finale and Giants vs. Cowboys
Sorry it's taken me a couple of days to get the weekend stuff on here. There's less time during the holidays, but even less for the little things. Sorry if my intro is a little down, but unfortunately the topics for today's blog were a part of the most frustrating sports weekend I've ever had. There was its upsides, sure, but in the end I was so worked up that I vented about it to most everyone I discussed it with. So I will be keeping this brief so I don't get worked up again.
Saturday night was the start with The Ultimate Fighter Finale for season 8. What made the event interesting was that other than 2 fights on the card, every other fight featured fighters from the recent season of the show. This hasn't been done in quite a while.
The first fight was between lightweights Dave Kaplan and Junie Browning. Based on the show, I really came to dislike Browning, and hoped he wouldn't have a career in the UFC. Unfortunately, they gave him this fight against an easy competitor, and he won by submission in the second round by armbar. And afterwards he was awarded the Fight of the Night bonus, which made absolutely no sense to me since it was so one-sided.
Next was Wilson Gouveia taking on Jason MacDonald. At the weigh-ins the day before, Gouveia missed the middleweight requirement by 4 pounds, so it would seem that he would be out of shape and MacDonald should win provided he fight smart. But he managed to prove us wrong by charging at the well-known striker, and got KO'd in the first round for his efforts. Already this wasn't looking good as my picks to win weren't holding up.
After that was a welterweight rematch between Anthony Johnson and Kevin Burns. The first fight ended when Burns accidently poked Johnson in the eye, and Johnson fell to the ground, which led the referee to believe that Johnson had been knocked out. So this fight came, and some action filled the first two rounds until Johnson got justice, and knocked out Burns with a beautiful kick to his chin. Finally, the guy I rooted for won a fight!
Two undercard fights were shown before the two main event fights. Elliot Marshall submitted Jules Bruchez with ease in a rear-naked choke in their light heavyweight fight, and Krzysztof Soszynski submitted Shane Primm with a kimura in the second that nearly ripped his shoulder apart. Two more picks went my way thanks to these light heavyweights.
Then was the fight for the light heavyweight contract between Ryan Bader and Vinny Magalhaes. Most everyone had Magalhaes picked, but I was very confident in Bader. The surprise that came from this fight was that not only did Bader pick up the win, but he managed to KO Magalhaes with a right that was blocked, but still hard enough to send him to the ground. I jumped for joy when Bader was the winner, and hopefully we'll see him fight too.
Finally, it was time for Phillipe Nover to fight Efrain Escudero for the lightweight contract. Nover was highly praised on the show, compared to many great UFC fighters, and seemed to have the better skills than his opponent. So thinking about it, unless Escudero caught him by surprise, Nover should get the win, right? In the end, Escudero not only beat Nover, he dominated the first 2 rounds, and fought smart in the 3rd to get the unanimous decision. Almost seems illogical. After studying the results, I realized Nover, for all his talents, was not mentally prepared, and didn't have a gameplan for his fight. He got my hopes up, and then disappointed me. I can't say more.........
The weekend of course didn't end for me there. The big game between the New York Giants and Dallas Cowboys was on Sunday, and even though the Giants had clinched their division, they needed a good win to show they are still a team to be feared. After being 0-0 for most of the beginning, I missed a little of the game until the end of the second quarter, and saw that Dallas had pulled ahead 7-3. I wasn't worried as the game was close, and figured we had a chance as long as our defense could continue to hold, and our offense could maybe step up a little. That didn't happen right away, as Dallas scored another touchdown, and our offense starting to look like last week's, as Eli Manning was doing fine, but not only could their scoring players offer no help, but the players defending the QB couldn't keep their end of the deal. Dallas got up to 14-3. We got a lucky break in the forth quater with a touchback and a field goal, which meant all we need was a good touchdown for the win. Instead of holding Dallas, they scored an easy touchdown, making the score 20-8. With only two minutes left, I knew it was over, and stopped watching. That score was how the game ended.
Next Sunday we play the Carolina Panthers, the team right on our behind in the playoff picture. The Giants need to wake up in a hurry, as a win is needed to keep us in a good position in the playoffs. I can only hope our mistakes are corrected from these last couple of games.
Well, I need to talk about more pleasant things before my blood-pressure rises anymore. I recently finished LEGO Batman for the Playstation 2, and as much as I wanted to jump into Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, I think I'll wait until Christmas to see what games Santa throws at me.
That's my time for tonight. Until my TV wrap-up for the week, I think I'll start part 1 of my internal debate as to which new video game system I should get: Playstation 3, Wii, or X-Box 360? The feud in my mind will now be seen by all for your entertainment. Until then, I'm sure you can find something entertaining to read, watch, or participate in. I'll be using one of those forms to find entertainment right now.
Saturday night was the start with The Ultimate Fighter Finale for season 8. What made the event interesting was that other than 2 fights on the card, every other fight featured fighters from the recent season of the show. This hasn't been done in quite a while.
The first fight was between lightweights Dave Kaplan and Junie Browning. Based on the show, I really came to dislike Browning, and hoped he wouldn't have a career in the UFC. Unfortunately, they gave him this fight against an easy competitor, and he won by submission in the second round by armbar. And afterwards he was awarded the Fight of the Night bonus, which made absolutely no sense to me since it was so one-sided.
Next was Wilson Gouveia taking on Jason MacDonald. At the weigh-ins the day before, Gouveia missed the middleweight requirement by 4 pounds, so it would seem that he would be out of shape and MacDonald should win provided he fight smart. But he managed to prove us wrong by charging at the well-known striker, and got KO'd in the first round for his efforts. Already this wasn't looking good as my picks to win weren't holding up.
After that was a welterweight rematch between Anthony Johnson and Kevin Burns. The first fight ended when Burns accidently poked Johnson in the eye, and Johnson fell to the ground, which led the referee to believe that Johnson had been knocked out. So this fight came, and some action filled the first two rounds until Johnson got justice, and knocked out Burns with a beautiful kick to his chin. Finally, the guy I rooted for won a fight!
Two undercard fights were shown before the two main event fights. Elliot Marshall submitted Jules Bruchez with ease in a rear-naked choke in their light heavyweight fight, and Krzysztof Soszynski submitted Shane Primm with a kimura in the second that nearly ripped his shoulder apart. Two more picks went my way thanks to these light heavyweights.
Then was the fight for the light heavyweight contract between Ryan Bader and Vinny Magalhaes. Most everyone had Magalhaes picked, but I was very confident in Bader. The surprise that came from this fight was that not only did Bader pick up the win, but he managed to KO Magalhaes with a right that was blocked, but still hard enough to send him to the ground. I jumped for joy when Bader was the winner, and hopefully we'll see him fight too.
Finally, it was time for Phillipe Nover to fight Efrain Escudero for the lightweight contract. Nover was highly praised on the show, compared to many great UFC fighters, and seemed to have the better skills than his opponent. So thinking about it, unless Escudero caught him by surprise, Nover should get the win, right? In the end, Escudero not only beat Nover, he dominated the first 2 rounds, and fought smart in the 3rd to get the unanimous decision. Almost seems illogical. After studying the results, I realized Nover, for all his talents, was not mentally prepared, and didn't have a gameplan for his fight. He got my hopes up, and then disappointed me. I can't say more.........
The weekend of course didn't end for me there. The big game between the New York Giants and Dallas Cowboys was on Sunday, and even though the Giants had clinched their division, they needed a good win to show they are still a team to be feared. After being 0-0 for most of the beginning, I missed a little of the game until the end of the second quarter, and saw that Dallas had pulled ahead 7-3. I wasn't worried as the game was close, and figured we had a chance as long as our defense could continue to hold, and our offense could maybe step up a little. That didn't happen right away, as Dallas scored another touchdown, and our offense starting to look like last week's, as Eli Manning was doing fine, but not only could their scoring players offer no help, but the players defending the QB couldn't keep their end of the deal. Dallas got up to 14-3. We got a lucky break in the forth quater with a touchback and a field goal, which meant all we need was a good touchdown for the win. Instead of holding Dallas, they scored an easy touchdown, making the score 20-8. With only two minutes left, I knew it was over, and stopped watching. That score was how the game ended.
Next Sunday we play the Carolina Panthers, the team right on our behind in the playoff picture. The Giants need to wake up in a hurry, as a win is needed to keep us in a good position in the playoffs. I can only hope our mistakes are corrected from these last couple of games.
Well, I need to talk about more pleasant things before my blood-pressure rises anymore. I recently finished LEGO Batman for the Playstation 2, and as much as I wanted to jump into Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, I think I'll wait until Christmas to see what games Santa throws at me.
That's my time for tonight. Until my TV wrap-up for the week, I think I'll start part 1 of my internal debate as to which new video game system I should get: Playstation 3, Wii, or X-Box 360? The feud in my mind will now be seen by all for your entertainment. Until then, I'm sure you can find something entertaining to read, watch, or participate in. I'll be using one of those forms to find entertainment right now.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
TV For The Week: 12/7 to 12/13
I know I mentioned that I would be doing a TV preview of sorts, but I've decided to hold out for it for just a little bit considering that there are still a few shows finishing up before all those holiday specials run amok on most every channel. But considering there are no actual TV shows I'm interested in watching tonight, I think I'll go through the previous week of couch potato-ism(yes, you too can make up words by ending them with -ism.....or -ering if it ends with a consonant).
The Simpsons- Glad to see Mr. Burns get a spot on the episode, but not much else going on. Can't stand any episode with Lisa as the main focus. Not a strong episode in the end, but like I said, at least Burns got the spotlight for a good part of it.
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles- Although the episode seemed confusing with all sorts of bouncing around with the story, it wasn't completely lost. Brian Austin Greene got some time that he desparately needed to make him more useful to the series. And it's always good to get some glimpses into the future; it gives you a sense that what the good guys are doing is important. Overall, the episode was a just a filler for the season finale this Monday. Let's hope they show us why the show is worth staying.
Prison Break- Another strong episode leading up to their season finale on Monday. Michael Rappaport was more believable now than he had been. Definitely the show's strong point was the twists it threw at you during its last half. They have definitely gotten the hype up for what is hopefully an exciting episode coming up. Let's hope we get the answers we want, but with some promise of a good setup for next year.
Heroes- A step up from previous episodes. They finally corrected their characters of Sylar and Hiro, and now the show seems back on track. Good moments for most every character featured, and now I actually look forward to the finale on Monday. A little disappointed they already killed Arthur Petrelli, who was essentially the main villian for the season. Hopefully there will still be some battle worth seeing.
Dirty Jobs- The jobs featured in this episode caught me by surprise as they were more original. Didn't know turning gords into crafts had an almost factory process. The lake cleanup wasn't as interesting, and seemed cut short. Still, this show is good just to see something new that you never knew was out there.
My Name Is Earl- Although it was another generic episode like many of the ones this season, this one actually had some emotion and a lesson in the end that was actually worth while. Not too many noticeable jokes, but a good focus on the story setup, and it actually kept you guessing. Probably the best episode so far this season.
The Office- Some good moments for this episode. Dwight's little spots were intrigueing. The main focus on Meredith and Michael was a little offbeat, but still some laughs were had. The angle between Phyllis and Angela was funny up until the end, where they turned it very serious. After that, it was hard to find some laughs in that situation. Still, the show continues to be the top comedy show for the week.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- The show is just starting to find some real good footing. Another known character was introduced to the series, and had some moments with a fellow Jedi throught. General Grievous can now be taken seriously as a good villain in the series, thanks to the spotlight he got. Only thing lacking were some strong visuals, as the backgrounds seemed a little repetitive. Not gonna fault the show too much though since I'm sure its budget is limited.
The Soup- The regular episode was followed by a special on guys in reality television, so we got a double-dose this week. The regular episode offered quite a few laughs, and you know it's really funny when host Joel McHale can't help but laugh a little too. As for the special, not much new was seen obviously, but the clips featured weren't strong to begin with. Not a complete waste of a half hour, and still got enough laughs.
There's your week in TV. Tonight is the UFC's Ultimate Fighter Finale, so you'll be getting a full look at that tomorrow. Also coming up over the next few days will be a look at the Giants vs. Cowboys football game, maybe some talk about the wrestling world that I still try to keep up with, and I'll maybe compare the Playstation 3 and Wii systems to figure out which one would be worth getting, one or the other or even both if possible. Until all this comes up, I am tasking you with finding some entertainment.....as for me, I'm off in search for entertainment myself.
The Simpsons- Glad to see Mr. Burns get a spot on the episode, but not much else going on. Can't stand any episode with Lisa as the main focus. Not a strong episode in the end, but like I said, at least Burns got the spotlight for a good part of it.
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles- Although the episode seemed confusing with all sorts of bouncing around with the story, it wasn't completely lost. Brian Austin Greene got some time that he desparately needed to make him more useful to the series. And it's always good to get some glimpses into the future; it gives you a sense that what the good guys are doing is important. Overall, the episode was a just a filler for the season finale this Monday. Let's hope they show us why the show is worth staying.
Prison Break- Another strong episode leading up to their season finale on Monday. Michael Rappaport was more believable now than he had been. Definitely the show's strong point was the twists it threw at you during its last half. They have definitely gotten the hype up for what is hopefully an exciting episode coming up. Let's hope we get the answers we want, but with some promise of a good setup for next year.
Heroes- A step up from previous episodes. They finally corrected their characters of Sylar and Hiro, and now the show seems back on track. Good moments for most every character featured, and now I actually look forward to the finale on Monday. A little disappointed they already killed Arthur Petrelli, who was essentially the main villian for the season. Hopefully there will still be some battle worth seeing.
Dirty Jobs- The jobs featured in this episode caught me by surprise as they were more original. Didn't know turning gords into crafts had an almost factory process. The lake cleanup wasn't as interesting, and seemed cut short. Still, this show is good just to see something new that you never knew was out there.
My Name Is Earl- Although it was another generic episode like many of the ones this season, this one actually had some emotion and a lesson in the end that was actually worth while. Not too many noticeable jokes, but a good focus on the story setup, and it actually kept you guessing. Probably the best episode so far this season.
The Office- Some good moments for this episode. Dwight's little spots were intrigueing. The main focus on Meredith and Michael was a little offbeat, but still some laughs were had. The angle between Phyllis and Angela was funny up until the end, where they turned it very serious. After that, it was hard to find some laughs in that situation. Still, the show continues to be the top comedy show for the week.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- The show is just starting to find some real good footing. Another known character was introduced to the series, and had some moments with a fellow Jedi throught. General Grievous can now be taken seriously as a good villain in the series, thanks to the spotlight he got. Only thing lacking were some strong visuals, as the backgrounds seemed a little repetitive. Not gonna fault the show too much though since I'm sure its budget is limited.
The Soup- The regular episode was followed by a special on guys in reality television, so we got a double-dose this week. The regular episode offered quite a few laughs, and you know it's really funny when host Joel McHale can't help but laugh a little too. As for the special, not much new was seen obviously, but the clips featured weren't strong to begin with. Not a complete waste of a half hour, and still got enough laughs.
There's your week in TV. Tonight is the UFC's Ultimate Fighter Finale, so you'll be getting a full look at that tomorrow. Also coming up over the next few days will be a look at the Giants vs. Cowboys football game, maybe some talk about the wrestling world that I still try to keep up with, and I'll maybe compare the Playstation 3 and Wii systems to figure out which one would be worth getting, one or the other or even both if possible. Until all this comes up, I am tasking you with finding some entertainment.....as for me, I'm off in search for entertainment myself.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
UFC Fight For The Troops
I love it when I'm wrong. Looking at the fights that were on the card for this UFC event, I wasn't overly impressed. Some good fighters were on it, but nobody in the top of their division. Still, I stayed up and watch all 3 hours of this event that not only included the fights, but also a look at the Intrepid Heroes Fund, talk of TBI, celebrity endorsements to donate, and a lot of other things to support the cause the event was being held for. In the end, not only was the event successful, it also had some of the most exciting fights I've seen.
A lightweight fight started the event as Matt Wiman took on Jim Miller, who was a late replacement for Frank Edgar. Although Wiman was now a favorite, I had a good feeling about Miller. Plus he's from Jersey, so I had to root for him some. The fight won Fight of the Night honors because of the skill of Miller and the heart of Wiman. Miller ultimately won by decision, and after that I started having a good feeling about the event.
Next was a fight between middleweights Tim Creduer and Nate Loughran. I ended up buying into the hype of Loughran, and I payed for it. Creduer won the two rounds that the fight lasted very easily, and at the end of the second Loughran couldn't continue, so Creduer was awarded the TKO victory. I've learned to never underestimate Creduer ever again.
They then showed former WEC light heavyweight champion Steve Cantwell take on newcomer Razak al-Hassan. Not surprisingly Cantwell was a heavy favorite, and not only did he win easily in the first round, he topped the arm break of Tim Sylvia by Frank Mir from several years ago. Cantwell locked in an armbar, al-Hassan wouldn't tap out, so Cantwell turned his elbow inside out. The ref had no choice. I will also mention that this wasn't the only broken bone of the event. As was on UFC.com today, they showed a fight between lightweights Corey Hill and Dale Hartt. Hill was winning the fight through the first round, but things took a drastic turn in the second. Hill threw a leg kick at Hart, and broke his ankle. It looked like rubber, and was still an amazing thing to see. Sadly Hartt was given a win he didn't want, but both these fights had truly devastating results that made for good entertainment.
Next was a fight between Mike Swick and Jonathan Goulet. Again, Swick was an easy pick for victory in this welterweight fights. And in a matter of 33 seconds he proved us right as he TKO'd Goulet with a barrage of punches that put him out while he was on his knees. Swick has now made a serious move for taking on some top contenders in this weight class.
Before I go on to the main event, after the main card was over they showed another undercard fight between Steve Bruno and Johnny Rees. This was a tough fight to call for anybody, and it was a good fight that both men got into. It was back and forth until Bruno was able to lock in a rear-naked choke that forced Rees to tap out. Bruno gets his first win in the UFC, so now he needs another one.
Then it was the main event welterweight fight between Josh Koscheck and Yoshiyuki Yoshida. This was an interesting matchup because Koscheck was a wrestler, and Yoshida was a grappler. Koshcheck was favored to win, but something slightly unexpected happened. Don't get surprised, Kosheck did win the fight. But instead of it going the distance like most expected, Koshcheck landed a straight right in the first round that knocked Yoshida against the fence, bounced back with his hands down and a pained look on his face, and left himself open to a vicious right hook that knocked him out cold. Simply brutal.
The UFC put on a good show again. And guess what? We get treated to another show this Saturday! It'll be the Ultimate Fighter Finale on Spike TV, featuring many talented fighters seen on the show. Of course you'll hear about it this Sunday. As for my next blog before then, I'll go over the upcoming return of TV shows after the new year. Until then, go find something to entertain you..........I'm clocking out and looking for entertainment for myself.
A lightweight fight started the event as Matt Wiman took on Jim Miller, who was a late replacement for Frank Edgar. Although Wiman was now a favorite, I had a good feeling about Miller. Plus he's from Jersey, so I had to root for him some. The fight won Fight of the Night honors because of the skill of Miller and the heart of Wiman. Miller ultimately won by decision, and after that I started having a good feeling about the event.
Next was a fight between middleweights Tim Creduer and Nate Loughran. I ended up buying into the hype of Loughran, and I payed for it. Creduer won the two rounds that the fight lasted very easily, and at the end of the second Loughran couldn't continue, so Creduer was awarded the TKO victory. I've learned to never underestimate Creduer ever again.
They then showed former WEC light heavyweight champion Steve Cantwell take on newcomer Razak al-Hassan. Not surprisingly Cantwell was a heavy favorite, and not only did he win easily in the first round, he topped the arm break of Tim Sylvia by Frank Mir from several years ago. Cantwell locked in an armbar, al-Hassan wouldn't tap out, so Cantwell turned his elbow inside out. The ref had no choice. I will also mention that this wasn't the only broken bone of the event. As was on UFC.com today, they showed a fight between lightweights Corey Hill and Dale Hartt. Hill was winning the fight through the first round, but things took a drastic turn in the second. Hill threw a leg kick at Hart, and broke his ankle. It looked like rubber, and was still an amazing thing to see. Sadly Hartt was given a win he didn't want, but both these fights had truly devastating results that made for good entertainment.
Next was a fight between Mike Swick and Jonathan Goulet. Again, Swick was an easy pick for victory in this welterweight fights. And in a matter of 33 seconds he proved us right as he TKO'd Goulet with a barrage of punches that put him out while he was on his knees. Swick has now made a serious move for taking on some top contenders in this weight class.
Before I go on to the main event, after the main card was over they showed another undercard fight between Steve Bruno and Johnny Rees. This was a tough fight to call for anybody, and it was a good fight that both men got into. It was back and forth until Bruno was able to lock in a rear-naked choke that forced Rees to tap out. Bruno gets his first win in the UFC, so now he needs another one.
Then it was the main event welterweight fight between Josh Koscheck and Yoshiyuki Yoshida. This was an interesting matchup because Koscheck was a wrestler, and Yoshida was a grappler. Koshcheck was favored to win, but something slightly unexpected happened. Don't get surprised, Kosheck did win the fight. But instead of it going the distance like most expected, Koshcheck landed a straight right in the first round that knocked Yoshida against the fence, bounced back with his hands down and a pained look on his face, and left himself open to a vicious right hook that knocked him out cold. Simply brutal.
The UFC put on a good show again. And guess what? We get treated to another show this Saturday! It'll be the Ultimate Fighter Finale on Spike TV, featuring many talented fighters seen on the show. Of course you'll hear about it this Sunday. As for my next blog before then, I'll go over the upcoming return of TV shows after the new year. Until then, go find something to entertain you..........I'm clocking out and looking for entertainment for myself.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
A Look At Two-Face
Batman has probably the most well-known rogue's gallery (that's a comic term for list of villains) than any other comic book hero; probably bigger than anyone else's too. He actually has a lot of villains I like over some of the more super-powered ones out there. Bane. Scarecrow. Can't forget about the Joker either. Though these characters are well-known, I've come to respect one of the more intriguing characters that though well-known doesn't seem to be as popular. I'm talking about former attorney Harvey Dent, who after getting acid thrown in his face, turns into the criminal we know as Two-Face.
Probably the one thing that stands out to me is that Two-Face has an interesting modus operandi. Although most villains commit crimes to take over the city, or become filthy rich, or in the case of The Joker just because he can do it, Two-Face wants something else: justice. Now granted he has no problem committing crimes that would be against that, but in the end because he was once an attorney, and wants to see the right thing done. That's part of the split personality disorder he has: one side wants to do good, and the other wants to do bad. But rather than suffer with his two sides arguing against one another, he's found a way to settle it that I think is very creative: a coin toss. With a double-headed coin that he had one side scratched, every decision that involves right or wrong he flips it. Of course, the scarred side means that he'll probably do the wrong thing.
Part of what helps my fancy with this character is that he's a part of my favorite story in the Batman universe: The Long Halloween. The origin of Two-Face is told in this story about a mob family being murdered one by one on holidays on the calendar. The mystery gets deeper, and manages to involve most every major villain that's been a threat to Batman. As for the role of Two-Face, not only do you know where he comes from, but how he operates. And it makes for a great story. In the end, you see both sides of Two-Face in full force.
As for the movies, Two-Face has been portrayed in two of them. In "Batman Forever," he's portrayed by Tommy Lee Jones. Though more of your typical criminal than how he's portrayed in the comics, Jones puts on a great performance in his little speeches about justice, and uses his coin in most every moment there is. A more realistic approach his taken to the version played by Aaron Eckhart in "The Dark Knight." He's given a full origin in the movie (although different from the comics of course), and although his moments as Two-Face aren't as abundant, you get a real feel for why he is who he is. And he still uses the coin.
Harvey Dent/Two-Face is indeed my favorite Batman villain. I hope to read more stories involving just his character, as he seems to have gone from villain to vigilante to hero.......circling between all of these makes his character all the more interesting. I also look to further appreciate this character as I feel he's been well-thought out, even with a simple start in comic books so long ago.
What shall I talk about tomorrow if I get on here? Maybe I'll talk about the television shows I'm looking forward to after the New Year. A lot of my top favorite shows will be starting their newest season, while some will be returning from their break or hiatus from the holidays. Otherwise, Thursday you'll definitely be hearing about the UFC Fight for the Troops event that's on tomorrow night at 9pm on Spike TV. Though featuring some known fighters, nothing high-profile is happening; still, it's MMA, and it's free on TV, and it's an event especially for our troops overseas. It'll be something to watch, no matter how you look at it. Until all this though, you'll have to find your own entertainment while I do the same.......luckily I'm easily entertained.
Probably the one thing that stands out to me is that Two-Face has an interesting modus operandi. Although most villains commit crimes to take over the city, or become filthy rich, or in the case of The Joker just because he can do it, Two-Face wants something else: justice. Now granted he has no problem committing crimes that would be against that, but in the end because he was once an attorney, and wants to see the right thing done. That's part of the split personality disorder he has: one side wants to do good, and the other wants to do bad. But rather than suffer with his two sides arguing against one another, he's found a way to settle it that I think is very creative: a coin toss. With a double-headed coin that he had one side scratched, every decision that involves right or wrong he flips it. Of course, the scarred side means that he'll probably do the wrong thing.
Part of what helps my fancy with this character is that he's a part of my favorite story in the Batman universe: The Long Halloween. The origin of Two-Face is told in this story about a mob family being murdered one by one on holidays on the calendar. The mystery gets deeper, and manages to involve most every major villain that's been a threat to Batman. As for the role of Two-Face, not only do you know where he comes from, but how he operates. And it makes for a great story. In the end, you see both sides of Two-Face in full force.
As for the movies, Two-Face has been portrayed in two of them. In "Batman Forever," he's portrayed by Tommy Lee Jones. Though more of your typical criminal than how he's portrayed in the comics, Jones puts on a great performance in his little speeches about justice, and uses his coin in most every moment there is. A more realistic approach his taken to the version played by Aaron Eckhart in "The Dark Knight." He's given a full origin in the movie (although different from the comics of course), and although his moments as Two-Face aren't as abundant, you get a real feel for why he is who he is. And he still uses the coin.
Harvey Dent/Two-Face is indeed my favorite Batman villain. I hope to read more stories involving just his character, as he seems to have gone from villain to vigilante to hero.......circling between all of these makes his character all the more interesting. I also look to further appreciate this character as I feel he's been well-thought out, even with a simple start in comic books so long ago.
What shall I talk about tomorrow if I get on here? Maybe I'll talk about the television shows I'm looking forward to after the New Year. A lot of my top favorite shows will be starting their newest season, while some will be returning from their break or hiatus from the holidays. Otherwise, Thursday you'll definitely be hearing about the UFC Fight for the Troops event that's on tomorrow night at 9pm on Spike TV. Though featuring some known fighters, nothing high-profile is happening; still, it's MMA, and it's free on TV, and it's an event especially for our troops overseas. It'll be something to watch, no matter how you look at it. Until all this though, you'll have to find your own entertainment while I do the same.......luckily I'm easily entertained.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
Giants vs. Eagles and LEGO Batman
What can I say about the NY Giants today? In their game against the Philadelphia Eagles today, they looked like the Giants of old.......and I don't mean that in a good way. I was confident in the Giants, but I also had a bad feeling at the same time. Damn, and I was openly rooting for them in the face of my fellow Pennsylvanians who may or may not have been Eagles fans. Oh well, I guess I paid for it.
The first quarter was a little lackluster. Philadelphia managed a field goal, which didn't bother me too much. The Giants were generally holding them on defense. The offense, however, was a whole other story. Brandon Jacobs was his usual stellar self, but were was the passing game? Boss and Hixon were dropping passes they could've had, and Eli Manning had trouble finding some openings. They looked a little lost out there. The second quarter got worse, as Philadelphia started relying on Westbrook, and he brought them a touchdown without the Giants doing anything to stop him throughout. A small sign of hope came just before the half when the Giants blocked a field goal, and Dockery got a hold of it, and ran back for the touchdown. The score was 10-7.
I thought the Giants would wake up now, and start playing like they've been for most of the season. Instead, Jacobs got injured, and the Giants just couldn't get anywhere. Westbrook continued to run through the defense, and another touchdown and field goal got added to their score. Not much hope left at that point. In the last minute of the game, the Giants got a touchdown, making the score 20-14. Although it was a long shot, the Giants needed an onside kick, and one more touchdown to pull the game out by 1 point. The onside kick failed, and that was the end. I can't say the Eagles won easily, but as far as I saw it, the Giants beat themselves. I can only hope they get it together for the game against the Cowboys next week. While we've pretty much secured a playoff spot, I want to see us with some momentum going in.
Well, on the positive side, I will mention that I am close to finishing the current Playstation 2 video game I am playing, "LEGO Batman." Now, when I discuss the video games I've played, I want to talk about what's good, what's bad, and anything else interesting. Usually I'll wait until I finish the game completely, but I'm close enough with this one. Essentially in the game, you play as Batman and Robin through several levels, taking on some of his well-known villains. The levels take place in Gotham City, with many of its elements, including the characters, made of LEGO blocks that we probably played with as kids. As you play, there are many secrets you can unlock, including extra characters, power-ups to help you in the game, and pieces for building small LEGO structures.
What makes this game different than the Star Wars versions (I haven't played the Indiana Jones version yet, though hopefully Santa will leave that under my Christmas tree this year) is that after you play through the levels as Batman and Robin, you get to play a completely different version of those levels as the villains. This makes for a more expanded game compared to the previous versions. Aside from the special abilities that the various characters possess, this time when you play as Batman and Robin, they carry their own abilities different than anyone else. This alone adds to the gameplay value. Things also change up to because aside from playing as the characters themselves, you have levels where you get to use LEGO versions of their vehicles as well.
The only problems I've really seen with the game is that some of the darker levels hurt the look a little bit, and a good hand full of levels force you to use a few characters constantly. Although you can choose the characters you want to play as, there isn't a lot of variety as far as abilities go. While The Joker, Mr. Freeze, and The Riddler have some cool abilities, you end up using them constantly. A little too much repetition after a while.
Still, I can't take away from the actual fun you have with the game. Although I liked the Star Wars versions a little better, this one stands out as a good game too. Takes you back to playing with those LEGO toys as a kid, and you manage to find some fun while you're at it. Also like the other games, you do get a little committed to finding the extras. It also helps that the game is for 2-players, so you can have fun with your friends even after you're done with it. I never thought I'd get into these LEGO games, but I got caught by surprise.
Well, I think that's enough for now. Since this LEGO Batman game has me thinking about the original comic book, I think tomorrow I'll delve into that a little bit. Should I talk about my favorite Batman storyline, my favorite villain, or my favorite Batman ally? I'll decide that later. For now, it's up to you to find entertainment, while I do the same..........I knew I'd find a quote less dirty than the last one.
The first quarter was a little lackluster. Philadelphia managed a field goal, which didn't bother me too much. The Giants were generally holding them on defense. The offense, however, was a whole other story. Brandon Jacobs was his usual stellar self, but were was the passing game? Boss and Hixon were dropping passes they could've had, and Eli Manning had trouble finding some openings. They looked a little lost out there. The second quarter got worse, as Philadelphia started relying on Westbrook, and he brought them a touchdown without the Giants doing anything to stop him throughout. A small sign of hope came just before the half when the Giants blocked a field goal, and Dockery got a hold of it, and ran back for the touchdown. The score was 10-7.
I thought the Giants would wake up now, and start playing like they've been for most of the season. Instead, Jacobs got injured, and the Giants just couldn't get anywhere. Westbrook continued to run through the defense, and another touchdown and field goal got added to their score. Not much hope left at that point. In the last minute of the game, the Giants got a touchdown, making the score 20-14. Although it was a long shot, the Giants needed an onside kick, and one more touchdown to pull the game out by 1 point. The onside kick failed, and that was the end. I can't say the Eagles won easily, but as far as I saw it, the Giants beat themselves. I can only hope they get it together for the game against the Cowboys next week. While we've pretty much secured a playoff spot, I want to see us with some momentum going in.
Well, on the positive side, I will mention that I am close to finishing the current Playstation 2 video game I am playing, "LEGO Batman." Now, when I discuss the video games I've played, I want to talk about what's good, what's bad, and anything else interesting. Usually I'll wait until I finish the game completely, but I'm close enough with this one. Essentially in the game, you play as Batman and Robin through several levels, taking on some of his well-known villains. The levels take place in Gotham City, with many of its elements, including the characters, made of LEGO blocks that we probably played with as kids. As you play, there are many secrets you can unlock, including extra characters, power-ups to help you in the game, and pieces for building small LEGO structures.
What makes this game different than the Star Wars versions (I haven't played the Indiana Jones version yet, though hopefully Santa will leave that under my Christmas tree this year) is that after you play through the levels as Batman and Robin, you get to play a completely different version of those levels as the villains. This makes for a more expanded game compared to the previous versions. Aside from the special abilities that the various characters possess, this time when you play as Batman and Robin, they carry their own abilities different than anyone else. This alone adds to the gameplay value. Things also change up to because aside from playing as the characters themselves, you have levels where you get to use LEGO versions of their vehicles as well.
The only problems I've really seen with the game is that some of the darker levels hurt the look a little bit, and a good hand full of levels force you to use a few characters constantly. Although you can choose the characters you want to play as, there isn't a lot of variety as far as abilities go. While The Joker, Mr. Freeze, and The Riddler have some cool abilities, you end up using them constantly. A little too much repetition after a while.
Still, I can't take away from the actual fun you have with the game. Although I liked the Star Wars versions a little better, this one stands out as a good game too. Takes you back to playing with those LEGO toys as a kid, and you manage to find some fun while you're at it. Also like the other games, you do get a little committed to finding the extras. It also helps that the game is for 2-players, so you can have fun with your friends even after you're done with it. I never thought I'd get into these LEGO games, but I got caught by surprise.
Well, I think that's enough for now. Since this LEGO Batman game has me thinking about the original comic book, I think tomorrow I'll delve into that a little bit. Should I talk about my favorite Batman storyline, my favorite villain, or my favorite Batman ally? I'll decide that later. For now, it's up to you to find entertainment, while I do the same..........I knew I'd find a quote less dirty than the last one.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
TV For The Week: 11/30 to 12/6
I'm starting to think that with the new content in these blogs, they'll get longer than they previously will. Oh well, can't help it if I have a lot on my mind! Anyways, I thought I'd go over the TV shows I watched this week. How this works is that I'll run through the new episodes of shows I genuinely watch, and just give little blip of what was good to watch and what wasn't. If you'll notice, I'll start with this past Sunday, and work my way to today.
The Simpsons- Any Homer-related episode is fun to watch. Of course I loved the little salute to "24" in it. As usual, I'm never interested in Lisa's story. Still, a decent episode overall.
American Dad- So far this show has actually been better than "Family Guy" this season, but American Dad kept it simple this week. Some good jokes, and most of the cast was included at least. But not a lot of jokes were funny. Not their worst episode, but not their best.
Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles- Great episode for Summer Glau's character. She continues to impress. John Connor has been disappointing this season, but hopefully they'll do something major soon to change him up. I can only hope because as an avid Terminator fan, I want to see this show keep going.
Prison Break- After the best episode of the series last week, they of course had to tone it down a little. At least they did good in setting up how the rest of the season will go. Upset that the character Mahone disappeared during the end, and I hope they still keep him around as he's one of my favorites. The show's still going strong though.
Heroes- Still continues to go downhill. They finally returned the character of Sylar to his roots, but it may be too late, and even that wasn't handled properly. Still tired of Hiro's current angle. Glad to see the Haitian back, and to see some more development of Claire's character. Overall though, the events of the last couple of episodes have been pointless, and hopefully they can turn things around with the showdown they're promising this Monday.
Dirty Jobs- I still can't believe they keep coming up with ideas, and can still be fun to watch. Can't help but enjoy Mike Rowe's wit and humor. Getting more entertaining now that they involve the crew more (last week's episode did that great).
My Name Is Earl- Another general episode with some decent help with a guest character. Not too many laughs though. I'm waiting for the show to have some continueing storylines, and maybe even some major changes to keep it fresh. I used to love this show, but now it's getting absurd.
The Office- Still funny as always. Glad to see they're making things interesting between Jim and Pam. Dwight and Andy continue to get the most laughs. While nothing major, this week was still entertaining. My current favorite comedy for sure.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- Yes, I watch a kid's cartoon for crying out loud. It's Star Wars, I cant help it. Glad they bring in various Star Wars characters that are known and liked. It was good that Asajj finally got some time since she hasn't been seen much since the movie. The episode was a little more adult too, so for me this ended up being a good episode overall.
The Soup- I'm glad this show catches the funny things we don't catch during the week. This episode was funnier than some of the last ones, and had a funny Clip of the Week involving a male soap opera star's thong sneaking out. Plenty of good clips overall, and some real good jokes about them.
Hulk Hogan's Celebrity Championship Wrestling- The finale for the season came, and Dennis Rodman is the winner. At first I was a little peeved because he had actually wrestled before, and is kind of friends with Hogan. But after watching the matches in this episode, he did deserve to win. Still, the episode itself suffered from some quick cuts in the matches to make them seem better when you know they probably sucked. It's a reality show! Still, I want to see the show come back since they do have something to work with. We'll have to wait and see.
That's it for this week. Next week you'll see most of this same lineup, though I may check out something different here and there. As for tomorrow, you'll see a recap of the Giants/Eagles football game, and maybe I'll throw in a little something extra. Until then, you'll have to entertain yourselves before I entertain you again...........Does that sound dirty?
The Simpsons- Any Homer-related episode is fun to watch. Of course I loved the little salute to "24" in it. As usual, I'm never interested in Lisa's story. Still, a decent episode overall.
American Dad- So far this show has actually been better than "Family Guy" this season, but American Dad kept it simple this week. Some good jokes, and most of the cast was included at least. But not a lot of jokes were funny. Not their worst episode, but not their best.
Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles- Great episode for Summer Glau's character. She continues to impress. John Connor has been disappointing this season, but hopefully they'll do something major soon to change him up. I can only hope because as an avid Terminator fan, I want to see this show keep going.
Prison Break- After the best episode of the series last week, they of course had to tone it down a little. At least they did good in setting up how the rest of the season will go. Upset that the character Mahone disappeared during the end, and I hope they still keep him around as he's one of my favorites. The show's still going strong though.
Heroes- Still continues to go downhill. They finally returned the character of Sylar to his roots, but it may be too late, and even that wasn't handled properly. Still tired of Hiro's current angle. Glad to see the Haitian back, and to see some more development of Claire's character. Overall though, the events of the last couple of episodes have been pointless, and hopefully they can turn things around with the showdown they're promising this Monday.
Dirty Jobs- I still can't believe they keep coming up with ideas, and can still be fun to watch. Can't help but enjoy Mike Rowe's wit and humor. Getting more entertaining now that they involve the crew more (last week's episode did that great).
My Name Is Earl- Another general episode with some decent help with a guest character. Not too many laughs though. I'm waiting for the show to have some continueing storylines, and maybe even some major changes to keep it fresh. I used to love this show, but now it's getting absurd.
The Office- Still funny as always. Glad to see they're making things interesting between Jim and Pam. Dwight and Andy continue to get the most laughs. While nothing major, this week was still entertaining. My current favorite comedy for sure.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- Yes, I watch a kid's cartoon for crying out loud. It's Star Wars, I cant help it. Glad they bring in various Star Wars characters that are known and liked. It was good that Asajj finally got some time since she hasn't been seen much since the movie. The episode was a little more adult too, so for me this ended up being a good episode overall.
The Soup- I'm glad this show catches the funny things we don't catch during the week. This episode was funnier than some of the last ones, and had a funny Clip of the Week involving a male soap opera star's thong sneaking out. Plenty of good clips overall, and some real good jokes about them.
Hulk Hogan's Celebrity Championship Wrestling- The finale for the season came, and Dennis Rodman is the winner. At first I was a little peeved because he had actually wrestled before, and is kind of friends with Hogan. But after watching the matches in this episode, he did deserve to win. Still, the episode itself suffered from some quick cuts in the matches to make them seem better when you know they probably sucked. It's a reality show! Still, I want to see the show come back since they do have something to work with. We'll have to wait and see.
That's it for this week. Next week you'll see most of this same lineup, though I may check out something different here and there. As for tomorrow, you'll see a recap of the Giants/Eagles football game, and maybe I'll throw in a little something extra. Until then, you'll have to entertain yourselves before I entertain you again...........Does that sound dirty?
Friday, December 5, 2008
WEC: Torres vs. Tapia and The Ultimate Fighter Finals
Wednesday night had 2 somewhat important events in MMA: the latest WEC event on the Versus Channel, or the final two episodes of "The Ultimate Fighter" for the season. Originally I was more interested in watching TUF, but after seeing that it wasn't on until late, I stuck with the WEC event.
I wasn't too enthusiastic about the WEC event since the only fight with promise was the Bantamweight title fight between champion Miguel Torres and Manny Tapia (Even that fight was terribly one sided). The rest of the fights tried to showcase some very promising talent, but proved as no real test for them. I also had a feeling that there wouldn't be anything impressive about any of the fights.
The first fight initially showed some promise as newcomers Joseph Benavidez and Danny Martinez went at it. Benavidez showed some promise with some unique striking you don't see too much (straight kicks to the face, spin kicks....mostly kicks actually), but other than that and a hard hip throw, he didn't dominate very strongly. Martinez didn't fight smart to begin with, throwing one punch at a time hoping for a knockout. Benavidez got the unanimous decision in the end.
Two other bantamweights fought as highly-touted Brian Bowles fought Will Ribeiro. I had a little more faith in Ribeiro, but most were expecting Bowles to get an easy win. This fight ended when Bowles submitted Ribiero with a guillotine.........in the 3rd round. Before that, though Bowles was winning, he wasn't showing why he's one of the top guys, and I wasn't impressed.
The third fight of the event featured the debut of two well-known featherweight fighters: Wagney Fabiano and Akitoshi Tamura. Fabiano was a huge favorite, and expected to put on a great show. Fabiano finished the fight with an arm triangle........but it took until the 3rd round again. This fight was even more boring than the previous one, and Fabiano took down Tamura, and looked for submissions, but all Tamura did was defend constantly, barely putting up a fight. Still, Fabiano looked as if he should've finished this early.
Luckily, the main event title fight was actually exciting. Tapia was a major underdog, and I expected a quick finish from Torres. The first round consisted of Torres out-striking Tapia with the extra six inches of reach he had. Tapia could do nothing. In the second round, Torres knocked down Tapia twice with some hard shots, and then knocked him down a third time, and threw a few unanswered shots that forced the referee to stop the fight in favor of Torres. Impressive as always, I expect Torres to stay the champ for a very long time.
I ended up watching "The Ultimate Fighter" yesterday since I had recorded it, and let me say I was very happy with the results. The last two episodes consisted of the semi-final fights in the lightweight and light heavyweight divisions. First they showed Ryan Bader vs. Elliot Marshall. Bader was initially my pick to win the light heavyweight when the show started, and I was confident we would win this fight. Bader won by unanimous decision by taking down Marshall constantly. Marshall wanted to attempt some jiu-jitsu, but could put up much of a fight. Still Marshall is a promising fighter, and although it wasn't the most exciting, Bader showed that if he can't finish, he'll dominate and grind you out.
Next they showed lightweights Phillipe Nover and George Roop. Nover was my choice for winning the lightweight contract as soon as I saw how impressive he was in his preliminary fight. And he continued to impressive in his fight after that when he knocked down a guy with a strong chin. Again, he ran through Roop easily, charging in and taking him down. Although Roop managed to get on top, Nover worked on a kimura (arm lock) and secured it a few moments latrer, forcing Roop to tap. Very impressive again Mr. Nover. He may be the next big thing at lightweight.
The second episode then kicked of with light heavyweights Krzysztof Soszynski (don't ask me how to pronounce it) and Vinny Magalhaes. Most expected Soszynski to win, but I thought better. I saw Magalhaes getting the submission. Although Soszynski looked good at the start, winning with his striking, Magalhaes did what he did his last fight: picked up the pace towards the end of the round, got it to the ground, and locked in an armbar that Soszynski tapped out to. Soszynski is a good fighter, but needs a ground game.
The last fight was between Efrain Escudero and Junie Browning. For those of you who've seen the show, you know that Junie was not only out of control, but not the greatest fighter either. And most of the viewers, including the other fighters on the show, wanted to see him get beat. Escudero answered our prayers. After a slow first round that Escudero won by getting some better strikes in, Escudero took Junie down in the second, and submitted him with a D'arce choke. Oh what a line-up for the finals we have now.
From that start of this season, I was impressed with a lot of the fighters on the show, more than I was with the last couple of seasons. Now any of the guys in the finals I would be more than happy to see win the UFC contract. However, I do have my favorites picked to win. I expect Bader to win by unanimous decision of Magalhaes much the same way he beat Marshall. Although it's likely that Magalhaes could sneak in a submission, I think Bader could keep him in check. As for the Nover vs. Escudero fight, this one's a little easier to call: Nover should get the win. He's the better striker, and his ground game looks perfect to take on a wrestler like Escudero. Still, these will be some great fights to see. Everyone who was on the show will be fighting on the event (even Browning, unfortunately, who somehow gets his fight televised), but at least it will be a good line-up. Two fights between veteran UFC fighters will occur too, but they'll easily be outshined by the new talent from TUF Season 8.
That's all for today (I know this was a lot, but I don't care because I got it all out). The blog coming up this weekend is a toss-up; aside from the NY Giants/Philidelphia Eagles on Sunday, I would also like to cover the week in television, and we'll see if anything else comes up. When it comes to entertainment, you never know what you'll be entertained by until you see it. See you again soon!
I wasn't too enthusiastic about the WEC event since the only fight with promise was the Bantamweight title fight between champion Miguel Torres and Manny Tapia (Even that fight was terribly one sided). The rest of the fights tried to showcase some very promising talent, but proved as no real test for them. I also had a feeling that there wouldn't be anything impressive about any of the fights.
The first fight initially showed some promise as newcomers Joseph Benavidez and Danny Martinez went at it. Benavidez showed some promise with some unique striking you don't see too much (straight kicks to the face, spin kicks....mostly kicks actually), but other than that and a hard hip throw, he didn't dominate very strongly. Martinez didn't fight smart to begin with, throwing one punch at a time hoping for a knockout. Benavidez got the unanimous decision in the end.
Two other bantamweights fought as highly-touted Brian Bowles fought Will Ribeiro. I had a little more faith in Ribeiro, but most were expecting Bowles to get an easy win. This fight ended when Bowles submitted Ribiero with a guillotine.........in the 3rd round. Before that, though Bowles was winning, he wasn't showing why he's one of the top guys, and I wasn't impressed.
The third fight of the event featured the debut of two well-known featherweight fighters: Wagney Fabiano and Akitoshi Tamura. Fabiano was a huge favorite, and expected to put on a great show. Fabiano finished the fight with an arm triangle........but it took until the 3rd round again. This fight was even more boring than the previous one, and Fabiano took down Tamura, and looked for submissions, but all Tamura did was defend constantly, barely putting up a fight. Still, Fabiano looked as if he should've finished this early.
Luckily, the main event title fight was actually exciting. Tapia was a major underdog, and I expected a quick finish from Torres. The first round consisted of Torres out-striking Tapia with the extra six inches of reach he had. Tapia could do nothing. In the second round, Torres knocked down Tapia twice with some hard shots, and then knocked him down a third time, and threw a few unanswered shots that forced the referee to stop the fight in favor of Torres. Impressive as always, I expect Torres to stay the champ for a very long time.
I ended up watching "The Ultimate Fighter" yesterday since I had recorded it, and let me say I was very happy with the results. The last two episodes consisted of the semi-final fights in the lightweight and light heavyweight divisions. First they showed Ryan Bader vs. Elliot Marshall. Bader was initially my pick to win the light heavyweight when the show started, and I was confident we would win this fight. Bader won by unanimous decision by taking down Marshall constantly. Marshall wanted to attempt some jiu-jitsu, but could put up much of a fight. Still Marshall is a promising fighter, and although it wasn't the most exciting, Bader showed that if he can't finish, he'll dominate and grind you out.
Next they showed lightweights Phillipe Nover and George Roop. Nover was my choice for winning the lightweight contract as soon as I saw how impressive he was in his preliminary fight. And he continued to impressive in his fight after that when he knocked down a guy with a strong chin. Again, he ran through Roop easily, charging in and taking him down. Although Roop managed to get on top, Nover worked on a kimura (arm lock) and secured it a few moments latrer, forcing Roop to tap. Very impressive again Mr. Nover. He may be the next big thing at lightweight.
The second episode then kicked of with light heavyweights Krzysztof Soszynski (don't ask me how to pronounce it) and Vinny Magalhaes. Most expected Soszynski to win, but I thought better. I saw Magalhaes getting the submission. Although Soszynski looked good at the start, winning with his striking, Magalhaes did what he did his last fight: picked up the pace towards the end of the round, got it to the ground, and locked in an armbar that Soszynski tapped out to. Soszynski is a good fighter, but needs a ground game.
The last fight was between Efrain Escudero and Junie Browning. For those of you who've seen the show, you know that Junie was not only out of control, but not the greatest fighter either. And most of the viewers, including the other fighters on the show, wanted to see him get beat. Escudero answered our prayers. After a slow first round that Escudero won by getting some better strikes in, Escudero took Junie down in the second, and submitted him with a D'arce choke. Oh what a line-up for the finals we have now.
From that start of this season, I was impressed with a lot of the fighters on the show, more than I was with the last couple of seasons. Now any of the guys in the finals I would be more than happy to see win the UFC contract. However, I do have my favorites picked to win. I expect Bader to win by unanimous decision of Magalhaes much the same way he beat Marshall. Although it's likely that Magalhaes could sneak in a submission, I think Bader could keep him in check. As for the Nover vs. Escudero fight, this one's a little easier to call: Nover should get the win. He's the better striker, and his ground game looks perfect to take on a wrestler like Escudero. Still, these will be some great fights to see. Everyone who was on the show will be fighting on the event (even Browning, unfortunately, who somehow gets his fight televised), but at least it will be a good line-up. Two fights between veteran UFC fighters will occur too, but they'll easily be outshined by the new talent from TUF Season 8.
That's all for today (I know this was a lot, but I don't care because I got it all out). The blog coming up this weekend is a toss-up; aside from the NY Giants/Philidelphia Eagles on Sunday, I would also like to cover the week in television, and we'll see if anything else comes up. When it comes to entertainment, you never know what you'll be entertained by until you see it. See you again soon!
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Intro To The New Set-up
This may be still "Average Joe at the Movies," but I thought I'd throw in a little something extra. Since I have a hard time getting around to doing my movie reviews and previews, I thought to myself "how can I make this a regular thing?" I started thinking of all the things that keep me entertained during the course of the week, and since I usually bring them up on our regular blog now and then, I thought it'd be good to bring some of that here. So from here on out, you'll see the following areas explored on my behalf:
Movies-Still gonna do the reviews and previews, but I might throw in some talk about actors and the "state of movies," or anything along those lines.
TV Shows- Yes, I know I watch too much TV, but there's a lot of good stuff on. When I bring this up, I'll be talking about some TV highlights from the shows I watch during the week, and tell you what shows I'm intense about, and which ones are losing my interest.
Sports- I have to be brutally honest, and mention that the only sports I'll cover are MMA and the NFL. Of course, MMA will be at the top of my discussions, but now that my faith has been renewed in the NY Giants since last season, I'll bring them up too.
Comics- Although I'm not a fanatic, the stories told in comics are still some of the greatest stories ever told. I'll bring up my favorite characters, and all the major events occuring in the realms of DC and Marvel.
Video Games- Call me a child all you want, I still enjoy my video games. You'll hear about the games I'm currently playing, and what's coming out that peaks my interest.
Books- I don't read as much as I used to, but I'd like to pick it up again. This a simple one really, as I'll just talk about any books I've finished reading. These might be sparse on here, but they're still a part of entertainment.
Internet- The Internet may contain many of the topics above, but it has its own entertainment value. There are sites with videos you won't see anywhere, and information you might not get elsewhere. These are the things I'll discuss.
Hopefully this all makes for a more active blog, and maybe gets some sort of response. If anything, it'll be nice to get some of this out of my system rather than subject my wife to this stuff (getting called "nerdy" is the most I response I get, even if it's not really nerdy). So look for the first post tomorrow. It'll be MMA related, as I'll be covering the recent WEC event, and the outcome of the last episodes of "The Ultimate Fighter" show. See you soon!
Movies-Still gonna do the reviews and previews, but I might throw in some talk about actors and the "state of movies," or anything along those lines.
TV Shows- Yes, I know I watch too much TV, but there's a lot of good stuff on. When I bring this up, I'll be talking about some TV highlights from the shows I watch during the week, and tell you what shows I'm intense about, and which ones are losing my interest.
Sports- I have to be brutally honest, and mention that the only sports I'll cover are MMA and the NFL. Of course, MMA will be at the top of my discussions, but now that my faith has been renewed in the NY Giants since last season, I'll bring them up too.
Comics- Although I'm not a fanatic, the stories told in comics are still some of the greatest stories ever told. I'll bring up my favorite characters, and all the major events occuring in the realms of DC and Marvel.
Video Games- Call me a child all you want, I still enjoy my video games. You'll hear about the games I'm currently playing, and what's coming out that peaks my interest.
Books- I don't read as much as I used to, but I'd like to pick it up again. This a simple one really, as I'll just talk about any books I've finished reading. These might be sparse on here, but they're still a part of entertainment.
Internet- The Internet may contain many of the topics above, but it has its own entertainment value. There are sites with videos you won't see anywhere, and information you might not get elsewhere. These are the things I'll discuss.
Hopefully this all makes for a more active blog, and maybe gets some sort of response. If anything, it'll be nice to get some of this out of my system rather than subject my wife to this stuff (getting called "nerdy" is the most I response I get, even if it's not really nerdy). So look for the first post tomorrow. It'll be MMA related, as I'll be covering the recent WEC event, and the outcome of the last episodes of "The Ultimate Fighter" show. See you soon!
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Flashback Review: The Incredible Hulk
It took me a few days to get around to reviewing this movie since I saw it, but now I've got my chance. As a fan of comic books, of course I was interested in this one, regardless of how "The Hulk" did a few years ago. But this movie showed some promise. So here we go:
The Incredible Hulk
Dr. Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) is in hiding after a scientific experiment with gamma radiation turns him into the Hulk, a huge green beast only capable of destroying what's around him. On the hunt for him is General Thaddeus Ross (William Hurt), with some help from elite soldier Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth). While on the run from the military, Bruce continues his search for a cure to his "other personality," but from time to time has no choice but to turn into the Hulk to fight back the army and the dangerous Blonksy.
Holy s#$%, you'll be floored by the action sequences alone in this movie. Every time Bruce turns into the Hulk, you know you're going to see something impressive. The special effects are well done, and even the look of this Hulk is more impressive than was last seen. Also helping is Norton's portrayal of Banner, which though different than what you'd expect, actually works very well. His counterpart in Roth also carries well. The path to becoming the character of the Abomination is very well done, and Roth goes with it as if he is Blonsky. Pacing between these character developments and the action makes this a pretty well-done film. Also, as a comic book fan, I enjoyed the little spots as to the future of the franchise (the sight of the next possible villain, and the hint of the forming of the Avengers......can't wait).
A few flaws are present though. The characters portrayed by Hurt and Liv Tyler as Betty Ross don't seem to fit. Hurt seems a little hollow in his role, which was done a little better by Sam Elliot in "The Hulk" previously. Tyler seems more like herself than her character, and some extra moments with her character seem a little unnecessary (her boyfriend seems to have disappeared in the middle of it all, and her scenes with Hurt are a little forced). She was a little more interesting than "The Hulk's" Jeniffer Connolly, but still wasn't used properly. Also, the ending was a little muddled with no real insight into what the characters go through.
I do see this movie as being more than being one for the fans of comic books. This could be an enjoyable action movie for some too. Although it does help to know the comic-book character, you can turn off the "how" and "why" questions and just enjoy what you see outright. Even if you're curious, the movie isn't difficult to understand. Even some kids would get it.
Although a sequel hasn't been hinted at, this movie has some potential for any future it could have. More can be done and expanded on, as long as they keep it new in regards to the action and storylines. The Hulk can keep going. I look at it like Blonsky did in one of his confrontations with the Hulk:
"Is that all you've got?"
Granted, he got kicked into a tree after saying that, but I'm hoping the next view we get of the Hulk floors me as well.
The Incredible Hulk
Dr. Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) is in hiding after a scientific experiment with gamma radiation turns him into the Hulk, a huge green beast only capable of destroying what's around him. On the hunt for him is General Thaddeus Ross (William Hurt), with some help from elite soldier Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth). While on the run from the military, Bruce continues his search for a cure to his "other personality," but from time to time has no choice but to turn into the Hulk to fight back the army and the dangerous Blonksy.
Holy s#$%, you'll be floored by the action sequences alone in this movie. Every time Bruce turns into the Hulk, you know you're going to see something impressive. The special effects are well done, and even the look of this Hulk is more impressive than was last seen. Also helping is Norton's portrayal of Banner, which though different than what you'd expect, actually works very well. His counterpart in Roth also carries well. The path to becoming the character of the Abomination is very well done, and Roth goes with it as if he is Blonsky. Pacing between these character developments and the action makes this a pretty well-done film. Also, as a comic book fan, I enjoyed the little spots as to the future of the franchise (the sight of the next possible villain, and the hint of the forming of the Avengers......can't wait).
A few flaws are present though. The characters portrayed by Hurt and Liv Tyler as Betty Ross don't seem to fit. Hurt seems a little hollow in his role, which was done a little better by Sam Elliot in "The Hulk" previously. Tyler seems more like herself than her character, and some extra moments with her character seem a little unnecessary (her boyfriend seems to have disappeared in the middle of it all, and her scenes with Hurt are a little forced). She was a little more interesting than "The Hulk's" Jeniffer Connolly, but still wasn't used properly. Also, the ending was a little muddled with no real insight into what the characters go through.
I do see this movie as being more than being one for the fans of comic books. This could be an enjoyable action movie for some too. Although it does help to know the comic-book character, you can turn off the "how" and "why" questions and just enjoy what you see outright. Even if you're curious, the movie isn't difficult to understand. Even some kids would get it.
Although a sequel hasn't been hinted at, this movie has some potential for any future it could have. More can be done and expanded on, as long as they keep it new in regards to the action and storylines. The Hulk can keep going. I look at it like Blonsky did in one of his confrontations with the Hulk:
"Is that all you've got?"
Granted, he got kicked into a tree after saying that, but I'm hoping the next view we get of the Hulk floors me as well.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Flashback Review: 21
It sucks when work is slow, but it gives me those couple of hours I need to watch a movie without interruption. Going through the stack I have, this movie stood out, though I was somewhat hesitant. When the movie had first come out, I wasn't too interested in it. But after hearing some praise from people I know who had seen it, I thought I'd give it a chance. So I watched it, and now in what almost seems like forever, I have a review for you:
21
The movie is "based on true events" about an MIT student named Ben Campbell (Jim Sturgess), a nerdy but simple man looking to try to fund his way into Harvard Medical School. Picking up on his gift for numbers, Professor Mickey Rosa (Kevin Spacey) recruits him into his "blackjack team," learning to count cards in order to take Las Vegas for all it's worth. So begins Ben's enterprise, throwing away his old life in favor of that as a high roller. As expected, Ben realizes he can pay the price for his new found glory; and he has to somehow, as smart as he is, figure out how to roll with it all.
Though the most well-known actors (Spacey and Laurence Fishbourne) are given little time to show, the young cast as the team do well enough. Sturgess, Kate Bosworth, Liza Lapira and Aaron Yoo work pretty well together, and give the movie an energetic feel. But you can't leave out Spacey and Fishbourne, who hold the best moments of the film (Fishbourne sticks out to me more because he acts more badass than he did in "The Matrix"). Also apparent is the scenes of Vegas, which are very well done, and give you an idea as to why people get into the "Vegas spirit" when they're there.
This movie though is comparible to most any movie about a "nobody gaining a new life, but losing the important parts of his old life, and ultimately losing everything so he has to try to get some of his old life back" (please don't make me list them all here). The formula is too familiar, and as good as the acting is, you can't reallt get into the chain-of-events that complete it. Once Ben joins the team, you know exactly how the movie is going to go. What's also a little out of place is the narration. Considering the ending of the film, the narration should've been more fulfilling, and not as sporadic as it was. This also effects the flow, which is hampered some to begin with. The close ties between the characters seem to come to quick, as well-presented as they are, and almost takes away from some of its realism.
The audience that would appreciate this movie more is probably a younger audience who won't expect much from the older actors, and might take an interest in the "new blood" of the film. Also as is obvious, those who like gambling and card playing would go for it too (which is probably why those who liked it said so). Otherwise, it might not keep you interested enough. Stories like this have been told too many times, but if you like this kind of lifestyle, you might appreciate this movie more than the others like it.
Needless to say, Vegas does seem a little appealing to those who don't know what it's like. High rolling, chip stacks up to your eyes, suites better than your own home........almost like a dream come true if you can afford it. The people in this film were lucky enough to do it, and someone like you could be too. You may not know how to count cards, but you could play and hit that "blackjack", and here the saying from the dealer:
"Winner, winner, chicken dinner."
Strange words, but nice to hear when you realize you're a winner.
21
The movie is "based on true events" about an MIT student named Ben Campbell (Jim Sturgess), a nerdy but simple man looking to try to fund his way into Harvard Medical School. Picking up on his gift for numbers, Professor Mickey Rosa (Kevin Spacey) recruits him into his "blackjack team," learning to count cards in order to take Las Vegas for all it's worth. So begins Ben's enterprise, throwing away his old life in favor of that as a high roller. As expected, Ben realizes he can pay the price for his new found glory; and he has to somehow, as smart as he is, figure out how to roll with it all.
Though the most well-known actors (Spacey and Laurence Fishbourne) are given little time to show, the young cast as the team do well enough. Sturgess, Kate Bosworth, Liza Lapira and Aaron Yoo work pretty well together, and give the movie an energetic feel. But you can't leave out Spacey and Fishbourne, who hold the best moments of the film (Fishbourne sticks out to me more because he acts more badass than he did in "The Matrix"). Also apparent is the scenes of Vegas, which are very well done, and give you an idea as to why people get into the "Vegas spirit" when they're there.
This movie though is comparible to most any movie about a "nobody gaining a new life, but losing the important parts of his old life, and ultimately losing everything so he has to try to get some of his old life back" (please don't make me list them all here). The formula is too familiar, and as good as the acting is, you can't reallt get into the chain-of-events that complete it. Once Ben joins the team, you know exactly how the movie is going to go. What's also a little out of place is the narration. Considering the ending of the film, the narration should've been more fulfilling, and not as sporadic as it was. This also effects the flow, which is hampered some to begin with. The close ties between the characters seem to come to quick, as well-presented as they are, and almost takes away from some of its realism.
The audience that would appreciate this movie more is probably a younger audience who won't expect much from the older actors, and might take an interest in the "new blood" of the film. Also as is obvious, those who like gambling and card playing would go for it too (which is probably why those who liked it said so). Otherwise, it might not keep you interested enough. Stories like this have been told too many times, but if you like this kind of lifestyle, you might appreciate this movie more than the others like it.
Needless to say, Vegas does seem a little appealing to those who don't know what it's like. High rolling, chip stacks up to your eyes, suites better than your own home........almost like a dream come true if you can afford it. The people in this film were lucky enough to do it, and someone like you could be too. You may not know how to count cards, but you could play and hit that "blackjack", and here the saying from the dealer:
"Winner, winner, chicken dinner."
Strange words, but nice to hear when you realize you're a winner.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Coming Attractions
We're getting close to the "Oscar season" (stupid considering some really good movies come out in the middle of the year too), so some potential contenders are coming out soon. Lets look at some as well as what might catch your eye:
Body of Lies- Leo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe team up in a spy thriller that seems to have quite an edge.....which makes for a good spy movie. Plus I'm a huge Crowe fan, and I've been waiting for his next big movie for a while. Expect Oscar nods too.
Max Payne- The video game this is based on had an incredible story, and the visuals from the previews seem to indicate a strong action film. Not really a Mark Wahlberg fan, and the fact that it was just rated PG-13 have hurt my interest a little, but I'm not ruling it out.
Changeling- Though only getting a limited release, this is supposed to be one of the first strong Ocsar-movies. I'm a fan of Angelina Jolie, and she seems poised for another Oscar in this drama that has an interesting premise and a well-rounded cast (Amy Ryan, John Malkovich, and Jeffrey Donovan).
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa- The first movie was pretty good, and the preview I saw seems like this will improve. Ben Stiller leads a great cast voicing the wild animals trying to get home while encountering the many zany situations they're sure to get in to.
Quantum of Solace- I haven't even seen "Casino Royale", but from what I've heard, the new version of Bond is one of the best. I'm hoping to see "Casino" before the next highly-anticipated film hits theaters.
The more serious movies are starting to show, and I'm sure I'll make some pre-nomination predictions(although I'm sure the real nominations will be INSANELY different), as well as some picks for when the Oscars come around. Seeing as how far away all that is, I'll have to try to fill that gap with hopefully some reviews. Once some of the major house-jobs calm down, then I'll hopefully have some more free time for movie time..........key word "hopefully."
Body of Lies- Leo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe team up in a spy thriller that seems to have quite an edge.....which makes for a good spy movie. Plus I'm a huge Crowe fan, and I've been waiting for his next big movie for a while. Expect Oscar nods too.
Max Payne- The video game this is based on had an incredible story, and the visuals from the previews seem to indicate a strong action film. Not really a Mark Wahlberg fan, and the fact that it was just rated PG-13 have hurt my interest a little, but I'm not ruling it out.
Changeling- Though only getting a limited release, this is supposed to be one of the first strong Ocsar-movies. I'm a fan of Angelina Jolie, and she seems poised for another Oscar in this drama that has an interesting premise and a well-rounded cast (Amy Ryan, John Malkovich, and Jeffrey Donovan).
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa- The first movie was pretty good, and the preview I saw seems like this will improve. Ben Stiller leads a great cast voicing the wild animals trying to get home while encountering the many zany situations they're sure to get in to.
Quantum of Solace- I haven't even seen "Casino Royale", but from what I've heard, the new version of Bond is one of the best. I'm hoping to see "Casino" before the next highly-anticipated film hits theaters.
The more serious movies are starting to show, and I'm sure I'll make some pre-nomination predictions(although I'm sure the real nominations will be INSANELY different), as well as some picks for when the Oscars come around. Seeing as how far away all that is, I'll have to try to fill that gap with hopefully some reviews. Once some of the major house-jobs calm down, then I'll hopefully have some more free time for movie time..........key word "hopefully."
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Flashback Review: 30 Days of Night
I had read the comic book that this movie was based on just before the first previews came out. The book is phenomenal, and an impressive read. So I looked forward to catching this movie. I missed it in the theaters, but got my chance to see it with some friends. So, would the movie live up to the standard set by the comic?
Welcome to Barrow, Alaska. A town that sees no daylight for 30 days straight during the year. Many residents leave for a time, leaving local Sheriff Ebon Oleson (Josh Hartnett) in charge. But as the long night comes, the town is suddenly cut-off from the rest of the world, and is then invaded by a group of blood-hungry vampires looking to take advantage of the constant darkness. Ebon must then keep a group of survivors safe, including his estranged wife Stella (Melissa George), until the sun can rise again.
The movie keeps some basic principles from the comic book, and even manages to improve on its few weaknesses. The movie has a good flow, and is easy to keep up with. Many special effects and visuals (especially the gore) are done extremely well, especially a scene with an overhead shot of the town with the vampires running amok. Even Hartnett does a good job as the hero, going back to his role from "Black Hawk Down" for some similarity. Ben Foster's small role stands out as quite disturbing and authentic. The rest of the cast when displaying horror are convincing enough.
The same can't be said of Hartnett's counterpart George, whose character is almost unneccessary and stale. The vampires themselves are not intimidating either, as they just act more like zombies than a well-organized faction. The final showdown at the end of the film also falls flat, and seems to come-and-go before you realize it's all over. The faults I've pointed out, although they seem few, are major things that hurt this film as they are essential to it.
The movie is better catagorized as a survival movie rather than a horror one. The desparation of the "human" characters is more interesting than the purpose of the vampires. While the movie has its moments, the overall goal it intended to achieve is far off. Still, I do rate this movie better than all those "gorefest" movies that have nothing but violence and special effects for the gore, and require no acting ability whatsoever. However, this movie gets you tense at the most rather than getting you scared out of your wits. You do however get a sense of what you would do in a situation like this. Do you hold out and hope you're not found? Or do you attempt to fight off the threat? Of course, head vampire Marlow looked at fighting this way:
"When man meets a force he can't destroy, he destroys himself. What a plague you are."
Makes it difficult to choose how to get out of the hell that is Barrow......which should really be called "Sorrow" after the horror it's seen.
Welcome to Barrow, Alaska. A town that sees no daylight for 30 days straight during the year. Many residents leave for a time, leaving local Sheriff Ebon Oleson (Josh Hartnett) in charge. But as the long night comes, the town is suddenly cut-off from the rest of the world, and is then invaded by a group of blood-hungry vampires looking to take advantage of the constant darkness. Ebon must then keep a group of survivors safe, including his estranged wife Stella (Melissa George), until the sun can rise again.
The movie keeps some basic principles from the comic book, and even manages to improve on its few weaknesses. The movie has a good flow, and is easy to keep up with. Many special effects and visuals (especially the gore) are done extremely well, especially a scene with an overhead shot of the town with the vampires running amok. Even Hartnett does a good job as the hero, going back to his role from "Black Hawk Down" for some similarity. Ben Foster's small role stands out as quite disturbing and authentic. The rest of the cast when displaying horror are convincing enough.
The same can't be said of Hartnett's counterpart George, whose character is almost unneccessary and stale. The vampires themselves are not intimidating either, as they just act more like zombies than a well-organized faction. The final showdown at the end of the film also falls flat, and seems to come-and-go before you realize it's all over. The faults I've pointed out, although they seem few, are major things that hurt this film as they are essential to it.
The movie is better catagorized as a survival movie rather than a horror one. The desparation of the "human" characters is more interesting than the purpose of the vampires. While the movie has its moments, the overall goal it intended to achieve is far off. Still, I do rate this movie better than all those "gorefest" movies that have nothing but violence and special effects for the gore, and require no acting ability whatsoever. However, this movie gets you tense at the most rather than getting you scared out of your wits. You do however get a sense of what you would do in a situation like this. Do you hold out and hope you're not found? Or do you attempt to fight off the threat? Of course, head vampire Marlow looked at fighting this way:
"When man meets a force he can't destroy, he destroys himself. What a plague you are."
Makes it difficult to choose how to get out of the hell that is Barrow......which should really be called "Sorrow" after the horror it's seen.
R.I.P. Paul Newman
When a legendary actor passes away, you just have to say something. Especially when it comes to Paul Newman. Cool Hand Luke. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. The Sting. This man was in some of the greatest movies of all time. And even the movies he was in that are lesser known are still some of his best. Two movies come to mind when I think along those lines: Slap Shot and Road to Perdition. Slap Shot was a comedy I had seen some time ago, and is still one of my favorites of all comedies. Paul Newman was the stand-out star of that one, and his charisma helped drive that movie to a great level of entertainment. Even when taking a supporting role in "Road to Perdition," he still stands out. He got a Best Supporting Actor nomination for that role too.
This man has been honored so many times that it's hard for me to pay any kind of tribute good enough here. All I can say is any movie I see with his name on it I will definitely look at with greater appreciation. Any serious actor looking to make it big need to take a cue from Paul Newman: charisma, personality, and dedication will make you as big a star as he was. There will never be another actor like him.
This man has been honored so many times that it's hard for me to pay any kind of tribute good enough here. All I can say is any movie I see with his name on it I will definitely look at with greater appreciation. Any serious actor looking to make it big need to take a cue from Paul Newman: charisma, personality, and dedication will make you as big a star as he was. There will never be another actor like him.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Coming Attractions
While there are movies in the theaters worth seeing, I thought I would give you a list of movies to definitely keep your eye out for:
Lakeview Terrace: Coming out this weekend, this movie sees Samuel L. Jackson go back to the role of the bad guy.........possibly. He harasses his new neighbors........but is also a cop. He is suspected of doing bad things........but the rest of the neighborhood likes him. What side is he on?
Blindness: No, this isn't an M. Night Shymalan movie, as much as it looks. A city is stricken blind, and the one person who isn't affected attempt a daring escape from their quarantine. Never seen anything like this before......get it? Blind people? Haven't seen it? Funny, right?
Eagle Eye: Shia LeBeouf gets a lead role as a normal guy who is forced to do things for a woman watching his every move. Throw in Michelle Monaghan as the normal gal in the same situation, and it seems like a good duo-movie. At least both are good to look at (of course Michelle is hot, and I know the ladies dig Shia).
X-Men Origins: Wolverine: This movie is pretty far off, but after seeing a trailer that got leaked online, I thought it worth mentioning. Wolverine, the most well-known character from the previous films, gets the star treatment in the movie that tells how he came to be. Hugh Jackman and counterpart Liev Shreiber look to steal the show in this one.
Damn, doesn't seem like anything strong will be out for a few more weeks. Don't worry, I'll fill you in when they get closer. If I'm lucky, I may be able to get a review in this weekend. We'll see how packed it is.
Lakeview Terrace: Coming out this weekend, this movie sees Samuel L. Jackson go back to the role of the bad guy.........possibly. He harasses his new neighbors........but is also a cop. He is suspected of doing bad things........but the rest of the neighborhood likes him. What side is he on?
Blindness: No, this isn't an M. Night Shymalan movie, as much as it looks. A city is stricken blind, and the one person who isn't affected attempt a daring escape from their quarantine. Never seen anything like this before......get it? Blind people? Haven't seen it? Funny, right?
Eagle Eye: Shia LeBeouf gets a lead role as a normal guy who is forced to do things for a woman watching his every move. Throw in Michelle Monaghan as the normal gal in the same situation, and it seems like a good duo-movie. At least both are good to look at (of course Michelle is hot, and I know the ladies dig Shia).
X-Men Origins: Wolverine: This movie is pretty far off, but after seeing a trailer that got leaked online, I thought it worth mentioning. Wolverine, the most well-known character from the previous films, gets the star treatment in the movie that tells how he came to be. Hugh Jackman and counterpart Liev Shreiber look to steal the show in this one.
Damn, doesn't seem like anything strong will be out for a few more weeks. Don't worry, I'll fill you in when they get closer. If I'm lucky, I may be able to get a review in this weekend. We'll see how packed it is.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Bashing the Critics
While looking up some info on "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" when I did its review, I had seen some comments from movie critics that basically bashed the movie to no end. And after reading the comments and after seeing the movie myself, the first thought I had was, "These people don't have a clue." You see, I actually stopped reading full reviews from actual critics some time ago because I would see movies that would get average reviews, yet the way they talked about them made them seem worse than how they grade it. Doesn't make sense to me that you would rate the movie a 3 out of 5, but say how it falls flat on its face and is not very entertaining.
I also notice that these critics seem to have their own guideline as to what makes a movie good. And if it's missing any of their criteria, even if the movie doesn't even need it, they sit there and say it sucks. Take "Clone Wars" for example. The movie was made to boost the upcoming television show on Cartoon Network, according to the people that made it. Critics said the movie looked like a Saturday morning cartoon....no kidding! Because it's completely computer-animated, the "Star Wars" franchise is stepping into new territory. One critic said something like "This isn't the Star Wars we've known and loved".......maybe because it's new? The critics bashed some aspects of the animation by comparing it to older shows.........even though George Lucas said their style was a way to pay homage to those shows. But the worst thing I had seen was the comments on the writing. Because this movie is animated, it is meant to get attention from kids. Considering kids would be more drawn to the visuals of the movie, you would expect the script to be easy to understand. Then the comments I saw said the movie's dialog was "simplistic," and character development was lacking because of the many action sequences. Now, think of yourself when you were a child. When watching a movie or TV show, did you even give a crap about character development and complex dialog? I sure as hell didn't.
One critic said "If you can regress your mind to that of a 12 year old, you could enjoy the movie." That's an intelligent critic. Not only did he give the movie some credit, he told you who it would appeal to. That's what any real critic would do. That's what I'm trying to do on here. There are a couple of movies that are truly bad, and deserve the reviews they get. "House of the Dead" is the best example I can give. Other than one interesting character, the movie was badly made. The movie was made in '03 and had 60's special effects, the characters really showed no personality and you could care less about, and the action scenes consisted of the camera rotating around every character while they fired guns.......which lasted like that a whole 15 minutes. That's a movie that deserved to get bashed.
Then you go to a movie like "The Warriors," which was a review I did some time ago. When the movie came out, it got some bad reviews, with critics harping on dialog, characters, and style. But the movie made good money on its release, and it has gained cult status to the point that critics themselves have re-examined the movie, and ended up giving it a better review. Goes to show you that even when the critics don't like it, the people still do.
The world of entertainment is not made for everybody. Certain things are only going to be liked by certain people. But if you take a movie, and make it sound like it's not worth anybody's time, then it ruins its chance to entertain people who would go for it. That's not what these "esteemed" critics should be doing. They place a value on these films when it should be up to the casual people who see them on their own. If you're looking for an opinion on a movie you might want to see, do you go out and find an actual critic? No, you find an average guy you know personally who has seen the movie. That person may say "it's great" or "it sucks", but you know what they like. So it's easier to judge how your take on the movie might be.
Here's how I usually like to operate: when I see a preview for a film, I look at who stars in it, how it looks, and what's the general story. If I see something I like in any of those aspects, chances are it's a movie I'll like. And honestly, I don't think I've seen a movie I was insanely hyped about, and didn't enjoy it. "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" was not liked by the critics. But I saw the preview. I like Star Wars, and I like action. This movie had what I wanted, and I enjoyed it. 'Nuff said. If you see a movie trailer, and it doesn't appeal to you, don't see it. There could come a time when you might end up seeing it and might like it, but it's not often. Even then, your level of entertainment may have changed anyways. But the biggest piece of advice I can give is this: forget what any movie critic on TV, in magazines and newspapers, and those online have to say about a movie. That's their "opinion," and will not be yours. Even if they give a movie an extremely positive review, but the ads didn't get your attention, you don't need to see it. "Chicago" won Best Picture at the Oscars, and was well reviewed. I had no interest in it, and never saw it. Just because it won an award doesn't mean it would get one from me.
Here's hoping you read all of this, and maybe got something from it. I do welcome any response, and I would also like to add that if there's a particular movie you'd like to see a review of, feel free to suggest it. Even if it's a movie I haven't seen, I'll go out of my way to see it. However, I need to stay true to my word, and I'll only see those that I have an interest in. Like "Sex and the City." I wouldn't touch that movie with a 10-foot pole.
I also notice that these critics seem to have their own guideline as to what makes a movie good. And if it's missing any of their criteria, even if the movie doesn't even need it, they sit there and say it sucks. Take "Clone Wars" for example. The movie was made to boost the upcoming television show on Cartoon Network, according to the people that made it. Critics said the movie looked like a Saturday morning cartoon....no kidding! Because it's completely computer-animated, the "Star Wars" franchise is stepping into new territory. One critic said something like "This isn't the Star Wars we've known and loved".......maybe because it's new? The critics bashed some aspects of the animation by comparing it to older shows.........even though George Lucas said their style was a way to pay homage to those shows. But the worst thing I had seen was the comments on the writing. Because this movie is animated, it is meant to get attention from kids. Considering kids would be more drawn to the visuals of the movie, you would expect the script to be easy to understand. Then the comments I saw said the movie's dialog was "simplistic," and character development was lacking because of the many action sequences. Now, think of yourself when you were a child. When watching a movie or TV show, did you even give a crap about character development and complex dialog? I sure as hell didn't.
One critic said "If you can regress your mind to that of a 12 year old, you could enjoy the movie." That's an intelligent critic. Not only did he give the movie some credit, he told you who it would appeal to. That's what any real critic would do. That's what I'm trying to do on here. There are a couple of movies that are truly bad, and deserve the reviews they get. "House of the Dead" is the best example I can give. Other than one interesting character, the movie was badly made. The movie was made in '03 and had 60's special effects, the characters really showed no personality and you could care less about, and the action scenes consisted of the camera rotating around every character while they fired guns.......which lasted like that a whole 15 minutes. That's a movie that deserved to get bashed.
Then you go to a movie like "The Warriors," which was a review I did some time ago. When the movie came out, it got some bad reviews, with critics harping on dialog, characters, and style. But the movie made good money on its release, and it has gained cult status to the point that critics themselves have re-examined the movie, and ended up giving it a better review. Goes to show you that even when the critics don't like it, the people still do.
The world of entertainment is not made for everybody. Certain things are only going to be liked by certain people. But if you take a movie, and make it sound like it's not worth anybody's time, then it ruins its chance to entertain people who would go for it. That's not what these "esteemed" critics should be doing. They place a value on these films when it should be up to the casual people who see them on their own. If you're looking for an opinion on a movie you might want to see, do you go out and find an actual critic? No, you find an average guy you know personally who has seen the movie. That person may say "it's great" or "it sucks", but you know what they like. So it's easier to judge how your take on the movie might be.
Here's how I usually like to operate: when I see a preview for a film, I look at who stars in it, how it looks, and what's the general story. If I see something I like in any of those aspects, chances are it's a movie I'll like. And honestly, I don't think I've seen a movie I was insanely hyped about, and didn't enjoy it. "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" was not liked by the critics. But I saw the preview. I like Star Wars, and I like action. This movie had what I wanted, and I enjoyed it. 'Nuff said. If you see a movie trailer, and it doesn't appeal to you, don't see it. There could come a time when you might end up seeing it and might like it, but it's not often. Even then, your level of entertainment may have changed anyways. But the biggest piece of advice I can give is this: forget what any movie critic on TV, in magazines and newspapers, and those online have to say about a movie. That's their "opinion," and will not be yours. Even if they give a movie an extremely positive review, but the ads didn't get your attention, you don't need to see it. "Chicago" won Best Picture at the Oscars, and was well reviewed. I had no interest in it, and never saw it. Just because it won an award doesn't mean it would get one from me.
Here's hoping you read all of this, and maybe got something from it. I do welcome any response, and I would also like to add that if there's a particular movie you'd like to see a review of, feel free to suggest it. Even if it's a movie I haven't seen, I'll go out of my way to see it. However, I need to stay true to my word, and I'll only see those that I have an interest in. Like "Sex and the City." I wouldn't touch that movie with a 10-foot pole.
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
R.I.P. Don LaFontaine + Soon To Come
You know who has the coolest voice in the movies? Vin Diesel? Christian Bale? Clint Eastwood? Hell no. That title belongs to Don LaFontaine. Most movies that come out get some hype while they're in development, then you find out about the cast and crew who are a part of it. Then those first teaser trailers come out, and get you a little interested. Finally, that first full preview comes out at a theater, and you here a deep voice saying something like "In the beginning..." or "In a world..." You hear that voice, and you know you're going somewhere else. And it's only the beginning of an amazing tale. Don LaFontaine got your attention in those first few seconds. Anybody that can do that in a few words has some talent rarely seen. No sports announcer, game show host, or animated voiceover could top what he's done. His voice will be sadly missed in the world of film.........he never had to actually star in any movie to become famous.
Anyways, just to let those of you out there who read this blog know, I plan on having a big post soon. I've been planning this for several days, getting my thoughts together, and making sure I make the best points I can. Nothing like this has gotten me so pumped up before, and I do want to at least give a hint as to what you'll be reading: I am going to bash a certain group of people who I feel commit the worst atrocities to the world of entertainment. And unfortunately, these people are still heard on a regular basis, and need to be silenced. While you ponder that, I must be going.
Anyways, just to let those of you out there who read this blog know, I plan on having a big post soon. I've been planning this for several days, getting my thoughts together, and making sure I make the best points I can. Nothing like this has gotten me so pumped up before, and I do want to at least give a hint as to what you'll be reading: I am going to bash a certain group of people who I feel commit the worst atrocities to the world of entertainment. And unfortunately, these people are still heard on a regular basis, and need to be silenced. While you ponder that, I must be going.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
New Review: Star Wars:The Clone Wars
I will let you know now that this will be the nerdiest, dorkiest, most loserish review I'll ever do (and I don't care if any of those words exist). But I raised myself in the Jedi arts (Star Wars geek I mean), and I felt obliged to get myself to the movies to see this one. And as destiny would have it, or as forseen by The Emperor (see first sentence of this paragraph), I got out of work earlier, and was able to drive straight to the theater to see:
Star Wars: The Clone Wars
Taking place between Episodes II and III, we find well-known Jedi Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi are leading the Republic clone troopers against the Separatist droid army (if you don't know any of this, Republic are the good guys, Separatists are the bad guys). In the midst of battle, they are given the special assignment of rescuing the son of crime lord Jabba the Hutt (fan or not, you should know who he is). Anakin is given a partner in Jedi-trainee Ahsoka Tano, and throughout the mission find that the Sith known as Count Dooku (another bad guy) has orchestrated the kidnapping, but also plans to ruin the Jedi in the process. Can the Jedi save the day?
For you to fully understand this movie, I'm going to review this two ways: from the standpoint of a Star Wars fan, and that of a general viewer (no, I don't have multiple personalities). So here we go:
Star Wars Fan: If the people who make the Star Wars films are good at anything, it's special effects. Although the movie is completely computer animated, the details are some of the strongest out there. The battlescenes and backgrounds are as detailed as can be. And the action is pretty much non-stop, with mere moments of inaction between the various battles the rage on around and involving all characters. Also, the characters that we know and love are true to character, not deviating from their equals in the actual prequels.
However, the constant activity in the film hinders the building of its characters, especially that of Ahsoka, who is new to the franchise all-together. Hopefully the television series soon to follow this will get into her origins more. Sadly as well, almost all the voices are new, none of them being done by well-known actors. It was nice that Samuel L. Jackson (no, he didn't say "mother f%*#er" in this one) and Christopher Lee provided their voices, but their parts weren't as strong. And sadly, the traditional "scrolling of the story so far" is missing from this film. Not a major letdown, but moreover because they replaced it with sort of a "newsflash" introduction.
Casual Fan: The movie's animation and tones make this not only a very kid-friendly film (I suspect many will become future Star Wars fans........not that there's anything wrong with that), but also mature enough for an adult to enjoy. Even the humorous lines can get a chuckle out out of everyone. And as expected, Lucasfilm delivers immensely on the special effects, which even adapt well with the somewhat cartoonish look of the characters (this is supposed to be a cartoon, so it works). Simply put, this movie is as visually entertaining as you can get.
But all the visuals make it so that any true acting (It's only voices, but it counts. Ever see "Phonebooth"? Kiefer Sutherland only has his voice in it, and he was the film's best actor) is almost non-existant. Anakin Skywalker and Ahsoka Tano are the only ones who they delve into, but only for about 10 total minutes between the two. Also related to this, the epic-feel of this movie should mean that more characters should be involved. Unfortunately, they're not. Obi-Wan, Anakin, and Ahsoka get the most lines, while the rest of the cast pop in and out for a few lines, barely contributing anything. They attempted to give Padme Amidala some time towards the end of the film, but this ends up throwing the flow off towards the end.
Back to my normal self, it's clear-cut that this movie was made for every Star Wars fan out there, and even manages to appeal to children as well. Also viewers who like visual aspects and simple characters might actually enjoy this as well (although those leaning towards the realm of sci-fi might appreciate this film more). I know the critics weren't fairly receptive to this movie because it lacks good characters, but I give the movie a little more credit (that's not a bias because I'm a Star Wars fan, I swear to it). I'm sure that the crew behind this movie wanted to save the best for the TV show that will be coming out soon. And for those of you who are fans, the movie sets the tone for what happens in Episode III. Like Count Dooku put it:
"This war will become very difficult for us."
Yeah, he had no clue he was gonna get screwed. Same for the rest of the galaxy........thanks to one man named Anakin.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars
Taking place between Episodes II and III, we find well-known Jedi Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi are leading the Republic clone troopers against the Separatist droid army (if you don't know any of this, Republic are the good guys, Separatists are the bad guys). In the midst of battle, they are given the special assignment of rescuing the son of crime lord Jabba the Hutt (fan or not, you should know who he is). Anakin is given a partner in Jedi-trainee Ahsoka Tano, and throughout the mission find that the Sith known as Count Dooku (another bad guy) has orchestrated the kidnapping, but also plans to ruin the Jedi in the process. Can the Jedi save the day?
For you to fully understand this movie, I'm going to review this two ways: from the standpoint of a Star Wars fan, and that of a general viewer (no, I don't have multiple personalities). So here we go:
Star Wars Fan: If the people who make the Star Wars films are good at anything, it's special effects. Although the movie is completely computer animated, the details are some of the strongest out there. The battlescenes and backgrounds are as detailed as can be. And the action is pretty much non-stop, with mere moments of inaction between the various battles the rage on around and involving all characters. Also, the characters that we know and love are true to character, not deviating from their equals in the actual prequels.
However, the constant activity in the film hinders the building of its characters, especially that of Ahsoka, who is new to the franchise all-together. Hopefully the television series soon to follow this will get into her origins more. Sadly as well, almost all the voices are new, none of them being done by well-known actors. It was nice that Samuel L. Jackson (no, he didn't say "mother f%*#er" in this one) and Christopher Lee provided their voices, but their parts weren't as strong. And sadly, the traditional "scrolling of the story so far" is missing from this film. Not a major letdown, but moreover because they replaced it with sort of a "newsflash" introduction.
Casual Fan: The movie's animation and tones make this not only a very kid-friendly film (I suspect many will become future Star Wars fans........not that there's anything wrong with that), but also mature enough for an adult to enjoy. Even the humorous lines can get a chuckle out out of everyone. And as expected, Lucasfilm delivers immensely on the special effects, which even adapt well with the somewhat cartoonish look of the characters (this is supposed to be a cartoon, so it works). Simply put, this movie is as visually entertaining as you can get.
But all the visuals make it so that any true acting (It's only voices, but it counts. Ever see "Phonebooth"? Kiefer Sutherland only has his voice in it, and he was the film's best actor) is almost non-existant. Anakin Skywalker and Ahsoka Tano are the only ones who they delve into, but only for about 10 total minutes between the two. Also related to this, the epic-feel of this movie should mean that more characters should be involved. Unfortunately, they're not. Obi-Wan, Anakin, and Ahsoka get the most lines, while the rest of the cast pop in and out for a few lines, barely contributing anything. They attempted to give Padme Amidala some time towards the end of the film, but this ends up throwing the flow off towards the end.
Back to my normal self, it's clear-cut that this movie was made for every Star Wars fan out there, and even manages to appeal to children as well. Also viewers who like visual aspects and simple characters might actually enjoy this as well (although those leaning towards the realm of sci-fi might appreciate this film more). I know the critics weren't fairly receptive to this movie because it lacks good characters, but I give the movie a little more credit (that's not a bias because I'm a Star Wars fan, I swear to it). I'm sure that the crew behind this movie wanted to save the best for the TV show that will be coming out soon. And for those of you who are fans, the movie sets the tone for what happens in Episode III. Like Count Dooku put it:
"This war will become very difficult for us."
Yeah, he had no clue he was gonna get screwed. Same for the rest of the galaxy........thanks to one man named Anakin.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Flashback Review: The Bone Collector
Unfortunately I was laid off for the day, and after doing some chores at home, I was bored enough to watch reruns of "CSI" on TV. Then it got me thinking that I should watch something I hadn't seen before, but along those same lines. Then it hit me that I had this movie:
The Bone Collector
Recently paralyzed forensic expert Lincoln Rhyme (Denzel Washington) gets pulled into a case involving a dead man and his missing wife. The killer responsible has left cryptic clues related to old murder cases, and Lincoln needs as much help as he can get to stop this all from happening again. Enlisted to help is street cop Amelia Donaghy (Angelina Jolie), whose discovery of the first murder and talents in analyzing forensics gets Lincoln's attention, and he takes her on as his protege.
The strongest element that comes from this movie is mood. Well-established through its scenes, music, and general mood of the characters, you can tell this was meant to be dark and disturbing. Denzel and Angelina actually make for a good pair in this film too. On their own, Denzel uses his charisma to the full effect of his character, and Angelina plays the struggle of her new role character-wise very well. When the two share the same scene, although it gets unlikely deep at times, carry on some of the most natural conversations involving most every emotion. The rest of the cast hold their own (Queen Latifah, Ed O'Neil, Luis Guzman and Micheal Rooker are good fits for their parts), but ultimately take a backseat to the "dynamic due."
Although the character's actions are strong, their development is a little lacking. Their backgrounds are only really spoken about in conversation, and some scenes meant to give them depth end up being unnecessary. Some of these moments include a possible romantic interest between Denzel and Jolie, but is pretty unbelievable and unimportant. And unfortunately, the revelation of who the killer is is not a surprise, and you could easily guess it midway through the movie.
This is movie you can easily enjoy if you're a fan of Denzel and Jolie (which is honestly the only reason I have this one), but doesn't have anything else to really offer. Hearing Jolie pull off a New York City accent is interesting though. I feel bad for not being able to fully recommend this movie because of its cast and setting, but it's hard to find it entertaining. It might be good to watch just to kill some time or reduce boredom for a couple of hours. You can sit through the entire thing at least without having to overthink it, and you might not bother to fast-forward through it either. But the choice is ultimately yours, according to Lincoln Rhyme:
"Destiny is what we make it."
Now you don't have to be worried if you're meant to see this movie or not.
The Bone Collector
Recently paralyzed forensic expert Lincoln Rhyme (Denzel Washington) gets pulled into a case involving a dead man and his missing wife. The killer responsible has left cryptic clues related to old murder cases, and Lincoln needs as much help as he can get to stop this all from happening again. Enlisted to help is street cop Amelia Donaghy (Angelina Jolie), whose discovery of the first murder and talents in analyzing forensics gets Lincoln's attention, and he takes her on as his protege.
The strongest element that comes from this movie is mood. Well-established through its scenes, music, and general mood of the characters, you can tell this was meant to be dark and disturbing. Denzel and Angelina actually make for a good pair in this film too. On their own, Denzel uses his charisma to the full effect of his character, and Angelina plays the struggle of her new role character-wise very well. When the two share the same scene, although it gets unlikely deep at times, carry on some of the most natural conversations involving most every emotion. The rest of the cast hold their own (Queen Latifah, Ed O'Neil, Luis Guzman and Micheal Rooker are good fits for their parts), but ultimately take a backseat to the "dynamic due."
Although the character's actions are strong, their development is a little lacking. Their backgrounds are only really spoken about in conversation, and some scenes meant to give them depth end up being unnecessary. Some of these moments include a possible romantic interest between Denzel and Jolie, but is pretty unbelievable and unimportant. And unfortunately, the revelation of who the killer is is not a surprise, and you could easily guess it midway through the movie.
This is movie you can easily enjoy if you're a fan of Denzel and Jolie (which is honestly the only reason I have this one), but doesn't have anything else to really offer. Hearing Jolie pull off a New York City accent is interesting though. I feel bad for not being able to fully recommend this movie because of its cast and setting, but it's hard to find it entertaining. It might be good to watch just to kill some time or reduce boredom for a couple of hours. You can sit through the entire thing at least without having to overthink it, and you might not bother to fast-forward through it either. But the choice is ultimately yours, according to Lincoln Rhyme:
"Destiny is what we make it."
Now you don't have to be worried if you're meant to see this movie or not.
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Flashback Review: Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay
Not too much of a "flashback" considering the movie just came out on DVD and was in theaters only a couple of months ago. But when you're hanging out with friends looking for a movie to give you a cheap laugh, it doesn't matter where it comes from. And while perusing comedy titles on their television, we came across this movie, and gave it a chance. So now I present to you a review for:
Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay
Two college student potheads named Harold and Kumar get the chance to go their their dream vacation to Amsterdam (for obvious reasons). But thanks to the stupidity of Kumar, both are accused of being terrorists by the passengers on the flight, and sentenced to the prison on Guantanamo Bay. Yet with an amazing amount of luck, both break out, and attempt to head to Texas where an old friend can help them out (although Kumar wants to go just to stop the wedding of an ex-girlfriend). So begins the adventure of these two stoners, leading to many uncomfortable situations, close capture by the government, and a run-in with Neil Patrick Harris (playing himself).
Those familiar with the first movie "Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle" know what to expect from this movie. Gross jokes, drug-induced visuals, and crude visual humor are very much present in this movie, and are even a step up from the first movie. Many jokes are creative, while some of the visuals immediately get your attention (some of which force you to react out loud, like we did) by way of showing you something you'd never expect. For example, Harold and Kumar go to a friend's party, and find that rather than highlight "topless" women, he tries to show a new style in "bottomless" women. John Cho and Kal Penn are able to stick to their characters well, but just like the first movie, Neil Patrick Harris has the best moments in the movie (from evading government agents while on shrooms to getting laid at a whorehouse).
Though the gags do get you wide-eyed, many are few and far between. There seem to be many moments where the people who made the movie make an attempt to tell a serious story, and it's plainly obvious that we are not supposed to take this movie seriously. The first movie keeps the jokes going non-stop, while this one takes a few too many breathers. And the rest of the cast play unoriginal characters that you could care less about. For instance, Rob Corddry plays an inept but bully of a government agent trying to capture Harold and Kumar, and does nothing to impress.
Definitely not the strongest of comedy movies, and not even better than the first, "Harold and Kumar" is only for those who love low-brow comedy, or may even think the first movie was the best comedy of all-time (far-fetched that definitely is..........did that make me sound like Yoda?). Even though it has its moments, anyone attempting to watch it a second time could fast-forward through much of it just to watch the good parts, and get through it in about 30 minutes. This would be a good idea if you need to kill some time before something good comes on TV, and honestly, just watching those few good scenes would actually be entertaining enough. I do reccommend the scene of the two getting high with George W. while he actually gives an impassioned quote:
"You don't have to believe in your government to be a good American. You just have to believe in your country."
Why couldn't he say something like that in any speech he gives?
Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay
Two college student potheads named Harold and Kumar get the chance to go their their dream vacation to Amsterdam (for obvious reasons). But thanks to the stupidity of Kumar, both are accused of being terrorists by the passengers on the flight, and sentenced to the prison on Guantanamo Bay. Yet with an amazing amount of luck, both break out, and attempt to head to Texas where an old friend can help them out (although Kumar wants to go just to stop the wedding of an ex-girlfriend). So begins the adventure of these two stoners, leading to many uncomfortable situations, close capture by the government, and a run-in with Neil Patrick Harris (playing himself).
Those familiar with the first movie "Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle" know what to expect from this movie. Gross jokes, drug-induced visuals, and crude visual humor are very much present in this movie, and are even a step up from the first movie. Many jokes are creative, while some of the visuals immediately get your attention (some of which force you to react out loud, like we did) by way of showing you something you'd never expect. For example, Harold and Kumar go to a friend's party, and find that rather than highlight "topless" women, he tries to show a new style in "bottomless" women. John Cho and Kal Penn are able to stick to their characters well, but just like the first movie, Neil Patrick Harris has the best moments in the movie (from evading government agents while on shrooms to getting laid at a whorehouse).
Though the gags do get you wide-eyed, many are few and far between. There seem to be many moments where the people who made the movie make an attempt to tell a serious story, and it's plainly obvious that we are not supposed to take this movie seriously. The first movie keeps the jokes going non-stop, while this one takes a few too many breathers. And the rest of the cast play unoriginal characters that you could care less about. For instance, Rob Corddry plays an inept but bully of a government agent trying to capture Harold and Kumar, and does nothing to impress.
Definitely not the strongest of comedy movies, and not even better than the first, "Harold and Kumar" is only for those who love low-brow comedy, or may even think the first movie was the best comedy of all-time (far-fetched that definitely is..........did that make me sound like Yoda?). Even though it has its moments, anyone attempting to watch it a second time could fast-forward through much of it just to watch the good parts, and get through it in about 30 minutes. This would be a good idea if you need to kill some time before something good comes on TV, and honestly, just watching those few good scenes would actually be entertaining enough. I do reccommend the scene of the two getting high with George W. while he actually gives an impassioned quote:
"You don't have to believe in your government to be a good American. You just have to believe in your country."
Why couldn't he say something like that in any speech he gives?
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Coming Soon..........
Construction on the house has delayed me from getting a review to you this week, so I need to at least post something..........I know! Let's see what is in the future of the theaters. Does anything getting released soon peak my interest? Well, here's a list for you:
Death Race: Not jazzed about remakes, but a few get my attention. Seeing the short action sequences in the previews for this movie, you'll understand why. Jason Statham is a bonus too.
Traitor: Serious spy movies as very entertaining, and they've been on a roll as of late (the Bourne movies, Breach, etc.), and ones that have a good cast are even better (Don Cheadle, Guy Pierce, even Jeff Daniels...he counts).
Babylon A.D.: Vin Diesel's big action comeback looks promising. Sci-fi elements means it'll probably look good too.
Burn After Reading: All-star casts get my attention immediately, no matter what kind of movie. Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Tilda Swinton, France McDormand, John Malkovich............'nuff said.
Righteous Kill: Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino are together in a cop movie again. Although it hasn't been previewed much, it's DeNiro and Pacino in a cop movie again. If you loved "Heat," you'll love the fact that this movie has DeNiro and Pacino and it's about cops. Did I mention this movie is a DeNiro/Pacino cop film?
My Best Friend's Girl: A decent comedy worth checking out. Jason Biggs plays the loveable loser (again), Kate Hudson is the eye-candy (again), and Dane Cook plays a jerk on purpose........now there's something different.
We'll see what the future holds for me and these movies coming soon. As for the near future, expect some kind of review soon. I hope..........damn spackling and sanding.
Death Race: Not jazzed about remakes, but a few get my attention. Seeing the short action sequences in the previews for this movie, you'll understand why. Jason Statham is a bonus too.
Traitor: Serious spy movies as very entertaining, and they've been on a roll as of late (the Bourne movies, Breach, etc.), and ones that have a good cast are even better (Don Cheadle, Guy Pierce, even Jeff Daniels...he counts).
Babylon A.D.: Vin Diesel's big action comeback looks promising. Sci-fi elements means it'll probably look good too.
Burn After Reading: All-star casts get my attention immediately, no matter what kind of movie. Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Tilda Swinton, France McDormand, John Malkovich............'nuff said.
Righteous Kill: Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino are together in a cop movie again. Although it hasn't been previewed much, it's DeNiro and Pacino in a cop movie again. If you loved "Heat," you'll love the fact that this movie has DeNiro and Pacino and it's about cops. Did I mention this movie is a DeNiro/Pacino cop film?
My Best Friend's Girl: A decent comedy worth checking out. Jason Biggs plays the loveable loser (again), Kate Hudson is the eye-candy (again), and Dane Cook plays a jerk on purpose........now there's something different.
We'll see what the future holds for me and these movies coming soon. As for the near future, expect some kind of review soon. I hope..........damn spackling and sanding.
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Slight Delay
Just thought I would put on a quick message. Due to construction at the house the weekend (which is oh-so-much fun) I have been unable to watch a movie to review. If I find the time, I will try to at least get a Flashback review over the next couple of days, otherwise you'll have to wait until this upcoming weekend. I do plan on seeing "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" (like I said, Star Wars-fan obligation, despite the critic's reviews I've seen so far) this upcoming weekend, and I will have an updated list of what will be out soon to see, and I may even incorporate some upcoming DVDs that could potentially get reviewed. All this will be coming soon to a blog near you! (Damn, that was a stretch)
Sunday, August 10, 2008
New Review: The Dark Knight
The time finally came. After hearing all the hype, and waiting for the appropriate three hours need to go to the movies, my wife Casey and I went to see the summer's biggest blockbuster:
The Dark Knight
The movie begins with a look at the newest criminal in Gotham: the Joker (Heath Ledger). His crime sprees have gotten the attention of the local mobsters, the authorites led by Detective Gordon (Gary Oldman) and District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), and most importantly crime-fighter Batman (Christian Bale). With the Joker's crimes increasing, the authorities and Batman work to bring him to justice and stop the terror he has caused. Sound simple, right?
The best word I can use to describe this movie is: Intense. The pace of the movie never stops, even in those relaxing moments the characters have. The action sequences are the some of the best coming from the current generation of film, and they don't sacrifice any character build-up in the process. Christian Bale continues to portray Batman and Bruce Wayne convincingly, and seems like there could have been no better pick for the part. Supporting actors Eckhart, Oldman, and even Morgan Freeman shine in the roles they play. And I know this isn't a real shock, but Heath Ledger steals the show through the entire movie. Not only has he kept the Joker character lively and dangerous, but he also stayed true to what the character represents. It's a real shame that we had lost a great actor in Heath.
It's very difficult to find a flaw in this movie. Although Michael Caine and Maggie Gyllenhaal don't have the strongest roles, they still play the part they need to. Maybe the character of Batman could have used a little more substance, but the struggle of Bruce Wayne being Batman is still a strong part of the film. See, even when I try to find a flaw, it seems like it doesn't really matter.
After all the hype surrounding this film, I can safely say that "The Dark Knight" has surpassed most any expectation you could have. This is certainly a top-tier film that could even be Oscar-worthy; not just Ledger's performance, but for many of the other strong aspects it has. This movie is well worth it to see, and if you happen to miss it, rent or buy it immediately. Not only is it amazing to watch, it also delivers on its philosophy. One of the best quotes in the film, as dark as it is, still makes you think:
"You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
After seeing this movie, you'll wonder to yourself which role you would want.
The Dark Knight
The movie begins with a look at the newest criminal in Gotham: the Joker (Heath Ledger). His crime sprees have gotten the attention of the local mobsters, the authorites led by Detective Gordon (Gary Oldman) and District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), and most importantly crime-fighter Batman (Christian Bale). With the Joker's crimes increasing, the authorities and Batman work to bring him to justice and stop the terror he has caused. Sound simple, right?
The best word I can use to describe this movie is: Intense. The pace of the movie never stops, even in those relaxing moments the characters have. The action sequences are the some of the best coming from the current generation of film, and they don't sacrifice any character build-up in the process. Christian Bale continues to portray Batman and Bruce Wayne convincingly, and seems like there could have been no better pick for the part. Supporting actors Eckhart, Oldman, and even Morgan Freeman shine in the roles they play. And I know this isn't a real shock, but Heath Ledger steals the show through the entire movie. Not only has he kept the Joker character lively and dangerous, but he also stayed true to what the character represents. It's a real shame that we had lost a great actor in Heath.
It's very difficult to find a flaw in this movie. Although Michael Caine and Maggie Gyllenhaal don't have the strongest roles, they still play the part they need to. Maybe the character of Batman could have used a little more substance, but the struggle of Bruce Wayne being Batman is still a strong part of the film. See, even when I try to find a flaw, it seems like it doesn't really matter.
After all the hype surrounding this film, I can safely say that "The Dark Knight" has surpassed most any expectation you could have. This is certainly a top-tier film that could even be Oscar-worthy; not just Ledger's performance, but for many of the other strong aspects it has. This movie is well worth it to see, and if you happen to miss it, rent or buy it immediately. Not only is it amazing to watch, it also delivers on its philosophy. One of the best quotes in the film, as dark as it is, still makes you think:
"You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
After seeing this movie, you'll wonder to yourself which role you would want.
Friday, August 1, 2008
Flashback Review: The Warriors
I went through my DVD collection to find a good movie for my first official review on this blog. I thought I'd go with something a bit older, not very well-known but has a following, and is very unique or one-of-a-kind. So here's my pick:
The Warriors
Taking place sometime in the 70's, the movie starts with a huge gathering of various New York City city gangs, including The Warriors from Coney Island. As the leader of the most powerful gang in the city preaches about taking it over, he is shot by a group of rogues called...the Rogues (pretty creative). Unfortunately, the Warriors are blamed for it, and have to make their way out of the city back to their home turf, avoiding every gang looking to bash their skulls in.
"The Warriors" turns into a chase movie right off the bat, and keeps the pace up very well, even during the breaks the gang gets (which usually lands them in worse trouble, or never works out their way either). The movie even throws in some deep, dramatic scenes; such as when the gang sees a group of teenagers coming from a high school prom. These little moments give the movie some appeal, and show that it's not just a thoughtless film. Although no actors stand out immensely, the personalities of the Warriors gang are the highlights, as their characters deal with their situations differently. The best scene the movie has to offer is a battle in the men's room at a subway station between the Warriors and the Punks (some of which are on roller skates). For its time, the brawl is creative with its use of surroundings and choreography.
The flaws the movie suffers from are the general faults of having a low budget. The movie lacks flow, cutting too quick between scenes and forcing you to adjust in a hurry from one event to the other. The ending also seems forced and hurried, and what should've been expected was cut down to a bare minimum. Lastly, some minor characters who could've been stronger are given no opportunity to do so (i.e. the new leader of the Riffs, who doesn't impress).
The movie has developed a cult following solely because there is not another movie similar enough. "Gangs of New York" touched on the beginnings of New York gangs, but this film shows us an era not really touched on in regards to this subject. The movie is also more for a viewer looking for something fun (an odd word to describe it, but I'll stick with it), than for a viewer who wants to think.
Overall, the movies strengths outweigh its weaknesses, making it entertaining to those even remotely interested in it. If you want to see something different than those mafia movies, yet with the same feel, go with "The Warriors." Oh, and F.Y.I.- a remake has been planned, and with a good budget, for once a remake will be better than the original.
So now that you've read this review, I've got one question for you-
Can You Dig IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Warriors
Taking place sometime in the 70's, the movie starts with a huge gathering of various New York City city gangs, including The Warriors from Coney Island. As the leader of the most powerful gang in the city preaches about taking it over, he is shot by a group of rogues called...the Rogues (pretty creative). Unfortunately, the Warriors are blamed for it, and have to make their way out of the city back to their home turf, avoiding every gang looking to bash their skulls in.
"The Warriors" turns into a chase movie right off the bat, and keeps the pace up very well, even during the breaks the gang gets (which usually lands them in worse trouble, or never works out their way either). The movie even throws in some deep, dramatic scenes; such as when the gang sees a group of teenagers coming from a high school prom. These little moments give the movie some appeal, and show that it's not just a thoughtless film. Although no actors stand out immensely, the personalities of the Warriors gang are the highlights, as their characters deal with their situations differently. The best scene the movie has to offer is a battle in the men's room at a subway station between the Warriors and the Punks (some of which are on roller skates). For its time, the brawl is creative with its use of surroundings and choreography.
The flaws the movie suffers from are the general faults of having a low budget. The movie lacks flow, cutting too quick between scenes and forcing you to adjust in a hurry from one event to the other. The ending also seems forced and hurried, and what should've been expected was cut down to a bare minimum. Lastly, some minor characters who could've been stronger are given no opportunity to do so (i.e. the new leader of the Riffs, who doesn't impress).
The movie has developed a cult following solely because there is not another movie similar enough. "Gangs of New York" touched on the beginnings of New York gangs, but this film shows us an era not really touched on in regards to this subject. The movie is also more for a viewer looking for something fun (an odd word to describe it, but I'll stick with it), than for a viewer who wants to think.
Overall, the movies strengths outweigh its weaknesses, making it entertaining to those even remotely interested in it. If you want to see something different than those mafia movies, yet with the same feel, go with "The Warriors." Oh, and F.Y.I.- a remake has been planned, and with a good budget, for once a remake will be better than the original.
So now that you've read this review, I've got one question for you-
Can You Dig IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Coming Attractions
Just to update this blog a little bit, I thought I'd throw in the names of some movies I am in anticipation of seeing in theaters. As much as I'd like to go to the movies every week, it is difficult to fit in. But don't worry, I've got a stack of about 20 movies I can watch in between to fill in the gaps so I at least get to do a review at least once a week. I can't guarantee I'll get to see all of these movies, but I'm gonna try.
WALL-E- Although it's on its way out of the theaters soon, I am curious about this one because the previews were appealing, plus from what I've heard, this movie will likely win Best Animated Film at the Oscars next year.
The Dark Knight- I hope to be seeing this movie next week when the viewer turn-out calms down, because the movie has so far lived up to the hype. Seeing how well "Batman Begins" was, I'm even more excited for this sequel.
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor- I was a big fan of the first two movies, so of course seeing the sequel is a good option. I will admit that I don't know if this movie will do as well as the previous one (not counting The Scorpion King), but Jet Li being in this one is enough of a pull for me.
Tropic Thunder- For me it's hard to find a good comedy movie to see, but this one seems like it's worthwhile simply because of Robert Downey Jr.'s character.
Mirrors- I'm not as psyched about this movie, but it's got Kiefer Sutherland, and I need to see him in something before "24" comes back on.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- As a Star Wars geek, I am obligated to see this movie. But the previews seem very promising, and the animated style makes it likely that they can go above and beyond what they could do in the rest of the films.
Check back here soon for my first official review coming soon.
WALL-E- Although it's on its way out of the theaters soon, I am curious about this one because the previews were appealing, plus from what I've heard, this movie will likely win Best Animated Film at the Oscars next year.
The Dark Knight- I hope to be seeing this movie next week when the viewer turn-out calms down, because the movie has so far lived up to the hype. Seeing how well "Batman Begins" was, I'm even more excited for this sequel.
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor- I was a big fan of the first two movies, so of course seeing the sequel is a good option. I will admit that I don't know if this movie will do as well as the previous one (not counting The Scorpion King), but Jet Li being in this one is enough of a pull for me.
Tropic Thunder- For me it's hard to find a good comedy movie to see, but this one seems like it's worthwhile simply because of Robert Downey Jr.'s character.
Mirrors- I'm not as psyched about this movie, but it's got Kiefer Sutherland, and I need to see him in something before "24" comes back on.
Star Wars: The Clone Wars- As a Star Wars geek, I am obligated to see this movie. But the previews seem very promising, and the animated style makes it likely that they can go above and beyond what they could do in the rest of the films.
Check back here soon for my first official review coming soon.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls
I finally went to the movie theater for the first time in a very long time. I was a big movie fanatic, but lately it's been hard to find a mere 2 hours just to sit and watch a movie quietly, and thoroughly enjoy it. Now that I have finally seen a movie, I feel a renewed appreciation for film, so I've decided to write a short review of the movie I saw tonight:
INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL
Just to give a brief rundown of the story (without spoilers of course), we see an older Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) being forced to help out a group of Russian communists led by Dr. Spalco (Cate Blanchette). What he is forced to help them find leads to a series of events surrounding the legend of the crystal skull (no duh), an artifact with the ability to grant unimaginable power. As is usual fashion, this adventure takes Indy and a few partners (Shia LeBouf and Karen Allen returning as her character from Raiders of the Lost Ark) around the world, and includes plenty of action, Indy wit, and old-fashioned fisticuffs.
I truly believe that fans of the older movies will enjoy this movie, and even casual movie-goers would get a kick out of it. Minus newer special effects, the movie has the feel of the older Indiana Jones movies; which is good in that they don't detract from what made the first movies fun in the first place. Standout performances go to Harrison Ford of course, as well as Cate Blanchette. Ford still has that action bravado that made him famous, despite the showing of his old age. And Blanchette was very appealing as the femme fatal villain, keeping very convincing in her role. As for the movie's pace, it very rarely slows down, and keeps the action going without over-doing it.
The only negative things I can say about the movie is that it gets unrealistic at times with some action sequences, and the truth of the crystal skull legend they reveal is way beyond what you would expect of an Indiana Jones movie. But then again, movies aren't meant to be realistic, even if they try.
So I guess I should give this movie a grade or a score or something, right? I don't want to do thumbs up or down, no stars, so school grades; I'll just do a score out of 10 so I can be more flexible to those who even take my opinion seriously. So for the movie Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, the score is:......................8.5 out of 10. Only having a few small faults, I would definitely recommend this movie, and I honestly feel that the movie belongs as a part of the Indiana Jones story.
Hopefully down the road I'll get to do this again, as I usually find some good movies that get my interest. Any responses and comments are welcome of course. Good night everybody!
INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL
Just to give a brief rundown of the story (without spoilers of course), we see an older Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) being forced to help out a group of Russian communists led by Dr. Spalco (Cate Blanchette). What he is forced to help them find leads to a series of events surrounding the legend of the crystal skull (no duh), an artifact with the ability to grant unimaginable power. As is usual fashion, this adventure takes Indy and a few partners (Shia LeBouf and Karen Allen returning as her character from Raiders of the Lost Ark) around the world, and includes plenty of action, Indy wit, and old-fashioned fisticuffs.
I truly believe that fans of the older movies will enjoy this movie, and even casual movie-goers would get a kick out of it. Minus newer special effects, the movie has the feel of the older Indiana Jones movies; which is good in that they don't detract from what made the first movies fun in the first place. Standout performances go to Harrison Ford of course, as well as Cate Blanchette. Ford still has that action bravado that made him famous, despite the showing of his old age. And Blanchette was very appealing as the femme fatal villain, keeping very convincing in her role. As for the movie's pace, it very rarely slows down, and keeps the action going without over-doing it.
The only negative things I can say about the movie is that it gets unrealistic at times with some action sequences, and the truth of the crystal skull legend they reveal is way beyond what you would expect of an Indiana Jones movie. But then again, movies aren't meant to be realistic, even if they try.
So I guess I should give this movie a grade or a score or something, right? I don't want to do thumbs up or down, no stars, so school grades; I'll just do a score out of 10 so I can be more flexible to those who even take my opinion seriously. So for the movie Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, the score is:......................8.5 out of 10. Only having a few small faults, I would definitely recommend this movie, and I honestly feel that the movie belongs as a part of the Indiana Jones story.
Hopefully down the road I'll get to do this again, as I usually find some good movies that get my interest. Any responses and comments are welcome of course. Good night everybody!
Hellboy 2
I went to the Stroud Mall Saturday morning to try and sell some CDs and DVDs I no longer wanted. The store I had brought them to had to wait a couple of hours until the higher-ups showed up to pay out, so I needed to kill some time. I took advantage of this, and went to the theater and paid $4 to see the sequel to Hellboy:
Hellboy II: The Golden Army
The movie begins with a tale of how the Golden Army came to be, and then takes you into the B.P.R.D. (Bureau of Paranormal Research and Development), where top agent Hellboy (Ron Perlman) leads its agents on taking on attacking paranormal creatures. He soon gets involved with the plans of an evil elvish prince (Luke Goss) who is attempting to find the Golden Army and unleash it on the human population. It then becomes a race to see who can get to the Golden Army first, all while Hellboy has to deal with his relationship with fellow agent Liz (Selma Blair) and the reaction of the human population to his existence.
Director Guillermo Del Toro is known for his visual tastes, and this movie doesn't hold back with its special effects and interesting look to the characters and surroundings (most notably the Goblin Market the characters enter). The movie's focus is entirely on these elements more than the story, which does hold its own thanks to the actors playing through it. Ron Perlman continues to show why he was the best choice for the Hellboy characters, and is the stand-out of the movie. The rest of the cast stay average, which was good considering the movie is about Hellboy.
As for flaws, the villain prince who is impressive in the fights scenes can't carry it onto the character he plays. Luke Goss was much more convincing as the villain in Blade II than as Prince Nuada in the film. Also Jeffrey Tambor's character as the head agent does a complete 180 from his character in the first movie, and I think that hurt his overall feel in the sequel. He was originally a hard-ass, and now he has become a timid supervisor, which doesn't fit like his character did originally.
Overall, the movie is worth watching just for its amazing visuals, and if you're a major fan of the Hellboy character. If you haven't seen the first movie, it's not completely necessary, but I can
say the the sequel has done better than the original. Rather than give a score this time, I'm just going to give a general statement about how entertaining the movie is. For those who like visually-pleasing movies and their fair share of science fiction and action will definitely enjoy this movie. Those who might not are those who aren;t fans of the sci-fi genre. That being said, I feel that Hellboy II is an entertaining movie that does the series well, and will likely spawn a third movie dowen the road.
Hellboy II: The Golden Army
The movie begins with a tale of how the Golden Army came to be, and then takes you into the B.P.R.D. (Bureau of Paranormal Research and Development), where top agent Hellboy (Ron Perlman) leads its agents on taking on attacking paranormal creatures. He soon gets involved with the plans of an evil elvish prince (Luke Goss) who is attempting to find the Golden Army and unleash it on the human population. It then becomes a race to see who can get to the Golden Army first, all while Hellboy has to deal with his relationship with fellow agent Liz (Selma Blair) and the reaction of the human population to his existence.
Director Guillermo Del Toro is known for his visual tastes, and this movie doesn't hold back with its special effects and interesting look to the characters and surroundings (most notably the Goblin Market the characters enter). The movie's focus is entirely on these elements more than the story, which does hold its own thanks to the actors playing through it. Ron Perlman continues to show why he was the best choice for the Hellboy characters, and is the stand-out of the movie. The rest of the cast stay average, which was good considering the movie is about Hellboy.
As for flaws, the villain prince who is impressive in the fights scenes can't carry it onto the character he plays. Luke Goss was much more convincing as the villain in Blade II than as Prince Nuada in the film. Also Jeffrey Tambor's character as the head agent does a complete 180 from his character in the first movie, and I think that hurt his overall feel in the sequel. He was originally a hard-ass, and now he has become a timid supervisor, which doesn't fit like his character did originally.
Overall, the movie is worth watching just for its amazing visuals, and if you're a major fan of the Hellboy character. If you haven't seen the first movie, it's not completely necessary, but I can
say the the sequel has done better than the original. Rather than give a score this time, I'm just going to give a general statement about how entertaining the movie is. For those who like visually-pleasing movies and their fair share of science fiction and action will definitely enjoy this movie. Those who might not are those who aren;t fans of the sci-fi genre. That being said, I feel that Hellboy II is an entertaining movie that does the series well, and will likely spawn a third movie dowen the road.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)